Skip Navigation U.S. Department of Health and Human Services www.hhs.gov
Agency for Healthcare Research Quality www.ahrq.gov
Archive print banner

S-Adenosyl-L-Methionine for Treatment of Depression, Osteoarthritis, and Liver Disease

Summary

Evidence Report/Technology Assessment: Number 64

This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://info.ahrq.gov. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.

Please go to www.ahrq.gov for current information.


Under its Evidence-based Practice Program, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) is developing scientific information for other agencies and organizations on which to base clinical guidelines, performance measures, and other quality improvement tools. Contractor institutions review all relevant scientific literature on assigned clinical care topics and produce evidence reports and technology assessments, conduct research on methodologies and the effectiveness of their implementation, and participate in technical assistance activities.

Select for PDF File (62 KB). PDF Help.

Overview / Reporting the Evidence / Methodology / Findings / Future Research / Availability of the Full Report



Overview

The objective of this report was to conduct a search of the published literature on the use of S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAMe) for the treatment of osteoarthritis, depression, and liver disease; and, on the basis of that search, to evaluate the evidence for the efficacy of SAMe. A broad search revealed sufficient literature to support a detailed review of the use of SAMe for three conditions: depression, osteoarthritis, and cholestasis of pregnancy and intrahepatic cholestasis associated with liver disease.

Depression will affect 10 to 25 percent of women and 5 to 12 percent of men in the United States during their lifetimes. Approximately 10 to 15 million people experience clinical depression in any given year. The annual cost for treatment and lost wages is estimated at $43.7 to $52.9 billion.

Osteoarthritis is the most common form of arthritis. An estimated 15 percent of Americans suffer from arthritis, and the annual cost to society is estimated at $95 billion. It is the second most common cause cited in claims for Social Security disability benefits.

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy occurs in 1 in 500 to 1000 pregnancies and is associated with an increased risk of premature delivery and fetal death. Intrahepatic cholestasis is a relatively common complication of a number of acute and chronic liver diseases such as viral hepatitis, alcoholic hepatitis, and autoimmune liver diseases. In two series of chronic liver disease patients, 35 percent had intrahepatic cholestasis characterized by elevations of bilirubin and liver enzymes. While an economic cost is difficult to assign to cholestasis, pruritus causes significant morbidity in affected patients.

Empirical evidence of the efficacy of SAMe for the treatment of these three conditions would be helpful to health care providers who manage them and would be useful in identifying areas for future research.

Return to Contents

Reporting the Evidence

Searches of the literature yielded 1,624 titles, of which 294 were selected to review; the latter included meta-analyses, clinical trials, and reports that contained supplemental information on SAMe. Ninety-nine articles, representing 102 individual studies, met the screening criteria. They focused on SAMe treatment for depression, osteoarthritis, or liver disease and presented data from clinical trials on humans. Of these 102 studies, 47 focused on depression, 14 focused on osteoarthritis, and 41 focused on liver disease (all conditions).

Return to Contents

Methodology

A panel of technical experts representing diverse disciplines was established to advise the researchers throughout the research. In consultation with the funding agencies and taking into account the uses for which SAMe was generally recommended, the use of SAMe to treat depression, osteoarthritis, and liver disease was selected as the focus of the report. The aim was to perform a meta-analysis whenever the literature was appropriate for such an analysis.

Search Strategy

Twenty-five biomedical databases were searched through year 2000: MEDLINE®, HealthSTAR, EMBASE, BIOSIS Previews®, MANTIS™, Allied and Complementary Medicine, Cochrane™ Library, CAB HEALTH, BIOBASE, SciSearch®, PsychINFO, Mental Health Abstracts, Health News Daily, PASCAL, TGG Health & Wellness DB, and several pharmaceutical databases. The researchers searched using the term SAMe and its many pharmacological synonyms, the three focus disease states, study design, and article type. They also searched the bibliographies of review and meta-analysis articles and questioned experts to identify additional citations. An additional 62 articles were identified from these sources, particularly from review articles and from citations suggested by the advisors.

Selection Criteria

Reports were included in the synthesis of evidence if they focused on SAMe for one of the selected diseases and presented the results of randomized clinical trials on human subjects. Language of publication was not a barrier to inclusion. About 25 percent of the selected studies were in foreign languages, mainly Italian.

Data Collection and Analysis

All selected titles, abstracts, and articles, in all languages, were reviewed independently by two reviewers who were fluent in the appropriate language, and all disagreements were resolved by consensus. Information was collected about patient demographics, disease state, intervention, study design, and outcomes. Sufficient numbers of homogeneous studies existed to permit a meta-analysis of the efficacy of SAMe for treatment of four conditions: depression versus placebo and active (pharmacological) therapy, osteoarthritis versus placebo and active (pharmacological) therapy, cholestasis of pregnancy versus placebo and active therapy, and intrahepatic cholestasis associated with liver disease versus placebo. The remainder of the liver disease studies were too heterogeneous for pooled analysis and were assessed qualitatively.

Return to Contents

Findings

Researchers identified 102 relevant studies in the three selected areas: 47 studies for depression, 14 studies for osteoarthritis, and 41 studies for liver disease. The majority of the studies enrolled small numbers of patients, and the quality of the studies varied greatly, as judged by the Jadad criteria. Results are summarized in five evidence tables. After removal of duplicate studies, the distribution of studies across the three selected areas was as follows:

Out of 39 unique studies considered, 28 studies were included in a meta-analysis of the efficacy of SAMe to decrease symptoms of depression.

  • Compared to placebo, treatment with SAMe was associated with an improvement of approximately 6 points in the score of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression measured at 3 weeks (95 percent CI [2.2, 9.0]). This degree of improvement is statistically as well as clinically significant and is equivalent to a partial response to treatment. Too few studies were available for which a risk ratio could be calculated for either a 25 percent or 50 percent improvement in the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Therefore a pooled analysis could not be done, but the results generally favored SAMe compared to placebo.
  • Compared to treatment with conventional antidepressant pharmacology, treatment with SAMe was not associated with a statistically significant difference in outcomes (risk ratios for a 25 and for a 50 percent decrease in the Hamilton Rating score for depression were 0.99 and 0.93, respectively; effect size for the Hamilton Rating score for depression measured continuously was 0.08 (95 percent CI [-0.17, -0.32])).

Out of 13 unique studies considered, 10 studies were included in a meta-analysis of the efficacy of SAMe to decrease pain of osteoarthritis.

  • One large randomized clinical trial showed an effect size in favor of SAMe of 0.20 (95 percent CI [-0.39, -0.02]) compared to placebo, thus demonstrating a decrease in the pain of osteoarthritis.
  • Compared to treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication, treatment with SAMe was not associated with a statistically significant difference in outcomes (effect size 0.11; 95 percent CI [0.56, 0.35]).

Eight unique studies were included in a meta-analysis of the efficacy of SAMe to relieve pruritus and decrease elevated serum bilirubin levels associated with cholestasis of pregnancy.

  • Compared to placebo, treatment with SAMe was associated with an effect size of nearly a full standard deviation (-0.95; 95 percent CI [-1.45, -0.45]) for decrease in pruritus and of over one and one-third standard deviations (-1.32; 95 percent CI [-1.76, -0.88]) for decrease in serum bilirubin levels.
  • In two clinical trials that were not pooled, conventional therapy (ursodeoxycholic acid) was favored over SAMe for the treatment of pruritus. One of them was statistically significant. For serum bilirubin, the results of three small trials varied, and no conclusion could be drawn.

Out of 10 unique studies considered, six studies were included in a meta-analysis of the efficacy of SAMe to relieve pruritus and decrease elevated bilirubin levels associated with intrahepatic cholestasis caused by a variety of liver diseases.

  • Compared to placebo, treatment with SAMe for pruritus was associated with a risk ratio of 0.45, meaning that patients treated with SAMe were twice as likely as placebo treated patients to have a reduction in pruritus (95 percent CI [0.37, 0.58]).
  • Studies that compared SAMe to active therapy were insufficient in number to permit pooled analysis.

Twenty remaining studies were too heterogeneous with respect to both diagnosis (a wide variety of liver conditions) and outcomes to permit pooled analysis. They were assessed qualitatively.

Return to Contents

Future Research

The review has identified a number of promising areas for future research. These areas are discussed briefly.

A need exists for additional review studies, studies elucidating the pharmacology of SAMe, and clinical trials. A better understanding of the risk benefit ratio of SAMe compared to conventional therapy, especially for depression and osteoarthritis, is very important. To that end, additional analysis of existing data could be done, but it would likely be more productive to support new definitive clinical studies to address this issue.

Good dose-escalation studies have not been performed using the oral formulation of SAMe for depression, osteoarthritis, or liver disease. Once efficacy of the most effective oral dose of SAMe has been demonstrated, larger clinical trials are indicated for the use of SAMe for depression, osteoarthritis, and cholestasis. Such trials would need to enroll large numbers of patients with homogeneous diagnoses, and focus on significant clinical outcomes. Ideally, they would compare SAMe to both placebo and standard care. Information on side effects and adverse events should be systematically collected in these trials.

For liver conditions other than cholestasis, additional smaller trials should be conducted to ascertain which patient populations would benefit most from SAMe, and what interventions (dose and route of administration) are most effective. Additional smaller clinical trials of an exploratory nature should be conducted to investigate uses of SAMe to decrease the latency of effectiveness of conventional antidepressants and to treat of postpartum depression.

Return to Contents

Availability of the Full Report

The full evidence report from which this summary was derived was prepared for AHRQ by the socalepc.htm">Southern California Evidence-Based Practice Center (EPC) under contract number 290-97-0001. Printed copies may be obtained free of charge from the AHRQ Publications Clearinghouse by calling 1-800-358-9295. Requesters should ask for Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 64, S-Adenosyl-L-Methionine for Treatment of Depression, Osteoarthritis, and Liver Disease.

The Evidence Report is also online on the National Library of Medicine Bookshelf.

Return to Contents

AHRQ Publication Number 02-E033
Current as of August 2002

 

The information on this page is archived and provided for reference purposes only.

 

AHRQ Advancing Excellence in Health Care