This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://info.ahrq.gov. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.
Please go to www.ahrq.gov for current information.
Full Title: Developing a Methodology for Establishing a Statement of Work for a Policy-Relevant Technical Analysis
View or download Report
Context: The Duke Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) initiated a project designed to improve the process of generating reports that synthesize and evaluate the scientific literature on topics of particular interest to health care policymakers, clinicians, and other decisionmakers. The project focused on two improvement opportunities: process efficiency and stakeholder satisfaction. We organized the analysis around the concept of a "statement of work (SOW)." As a contractual document, the SOW is the tangible manifestation of the objectives of each EPC project, serving as a foundation for interaction between involved parties, including technical details such as budget, timeline, and deliverables.
Objective: To identify potential solutions to the core constraints identified by the study.
Methods: The project proceeded in the following steps:
- An interview of participants in the EPC process.
- A review of the technical contracting literature relating to formulating SOWs for the production of policy reports and similar intellectual products, and policy literature related to the determinants of a successful policy analysis.
- A synthesis of both the interview results and literature review utilizing tools suggested by the Theory of Constraints (TOC).
TOC methods were applied to the initial results in order to identify a common undesirable effect (UDE) related to EPC reports: a report that does not get used is unsuccessful and is deemed fundamentally undesirable. A current reality tree (CRT) was constructed by working from this fundamental UDE at the top through proximate causes, and finally root causes identified during the process.
Conclusions: The analysis identified several problems that ultimately result in a report not meeting the partner's needs, and therefore not being used. The most significant problem—i.e. the core constraint (the most important target for improvement)—identified was that the partner does not know how to conceptualize and articulate needs, objectives, and specifications. Several major potential change strategies for this core constraint were then explored. Two change strategies: establish an ongoing relationship between partners, EPC, and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) early in the process, and utilize a changes clause were deemed to be the most practical means to exert impact on the SOW process by addressing this core constraint. In the final step, a Future Reality Tree was constructed representing an illustration of the impact of the proposed solutions on the EPC's SOW process.
Developing a Methodology for Establishing a Statement of Work for a Policy-Relevant Technical Analysis
Evidence-based Practice Center: Duke University
Topic Nominator: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Current as of January 2006