Skip Navigation Archive: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Archive: Agency for Healthcare Research Quality www.ahrq.gov
Archival print banner

This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://info.ahrq.gov. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.

Please go to www.ahrq.gov for current information.

Improving the Care of the Febrile Infant: Lessons Learned from AHRQ's Implementation Science Awards (Text Version)

Slide presentation from the AHRQ 2010 conference.

On September 28, 2010, Carrie L. Byington made this presentation at the 2010 Annual Conference. Select to access the PowerPoint® presentation (6.39 MB).


Slide 1

Improving the Care of the Febrile Infant: Lessons Learned from AHRQ's Implementation Science Awards

AHRQ 2010 Annual Meeting
Improving the Care of the Febrile Infant: Lessons Learned from AHRQ's Implementation Science Awards

Carrie L. Byington, MD
HA and Edna Benning Presidential Professor of Pediatrics
University of Utah

Lucy Savitz, PhD
Director of Research and Education
Intermountain Healthcare

Slide 2

The Febrile Infant-Who Has SBI?

The Febrile Infant-Who Has SBI?

Images of 11 babies are displayed on the slide.

Slide 3

Background

Background

  • Fever in infants 1-90 days of age is one of the most common reasons for medical encounters
    • 20% of all medical encounters in first 90 days
    • 58% of all ED visits at PCMC
  • Fever of ≥ 38C is associated with serious bacterial infection (SBI)
    • ~ 10% will have bacteremia, meningitis, or UTI
  • Significant variation in care
    • Low compliance with guidelines
    • Recognized as a research priority by AAP, ABP, IOM, PROS

Slide 4

What are we Doing About the Febrile Infant at Intermountain Healthcare?

What are we Doing About the Febrile Infant at Intermountain Healthcare?

  • Not-for-profit hospitals, physician group, and health plan
  • 24 Hospitals
  • 144 Clinics
  • 736 employed & 2,000+ affiliated physicians
  • Serves about of the 1/2 Utah's population of about 2.8 million

Image of a map of Utah is on the whole slide.

Slide 5

Intermountain's Clinical Integration Structure

Intermountain's Clinical Integration Structure

  • Clinical excellence is our core business.
  • Implementation of evidence-based medicine as an institutional responsibility, rather than responsibility of individual physicians.
  • Process identification & priority setting.
  • Process and outcomes improvement through clinical programs structure.

Slide 6

Clinical Programs

Clinical Programs

  • Care organized by clinical services across the system (shared work processes rather than traditional departments)
  • Led by practicing clinicians (physicians, nurses)
  • Supported by operational and administrative staff and other clinicians from allied specialties

Slide 7

Intermountain Clinical Programs

Intermountain Clinical Programs

  • Behavioral Health
  • Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery
  • General Surgery
  • Intensive Medicine
  • Oncology
  • Patient Safety
  • Pediatric Specialties
  • Primary Care
  • Women and Newborn

Slide 8

Challenge: Moving Evidence into Practice

Challenge: Moving Evidence into Practice

Reducing variation in compliance with evidence-based guidelines.

  • Care Process Models (CPMs) are narrative documents that aim at representing state-of-the-art medical knowledge.
  • Clinical Decision Support Tools can include all ways in which health care knowledge is represented in health information systems.
    • Advantages of computerized EB-CPM:
      • Provide readily accessible references and allow access to knowledge in guidelines that have been selected for use in a specific clinical context
      • Often improve the clarity of a guideline
      • Can be tailored to a patient's clinical state
      • Propose timely decision support that is specific for the patient

Slide 9

Key components of our strategy . . .

Key components of our strategy.

  • Identify problem
  • Establish evidence base
  • Develop, test, & implement using quality improvement tools (e.g., Six Sigma-define, measure, analyze, improve, control)

The University of Utah/Intermountain Febrile Infant EB-CPM was developed using an evidence base derived from prospective research at our institutions & others together with a Six Sigma process.

Slide 10

Key Quality Measures Included in the EB-CPM (The Intervention)

Key Quality Measures Included in the EB-CPM (The Intervention)

  • Core Laboratory Testing (CBC and UA)
  • Admit Patients High Risk for SBI
  • Viral Testing (EV and Respiratory Viruses)
  • Appropriate Antibiotics
  • Stop Antibiotics within 36 hours for Infants with Negative Bacterial Cultures
  • LOS 42 hours or less

Slide 11

Implementation Process: Key Steps

Implementation Process: Key Steps

Building EB
17 Publications

Clinical Program
Discussion

QI Test of Change Six Sigma @ PCMC

Facility Intro by Champion

Staff Meetings

Ready Access to Tools

Comparative Data Monitoring

Slide 12

A screen shot of Intermountain Physician.org is shown.

A screen shot of Intermountain Physician.org is shown.

Slide 13

An image of a page titled Inpatient Managemnt of Febrile Infants 1-90 days old

An image of a page titled "Inpatient Management of Febrile Infants 1—90 days old" and a flowchart of "Algoritum: Inpatient Care of Febrile Infants 1—90 days old." is shown.

Slide 14

An image of two forms are shown.

An image of two forms are shown.

Slide 15

An image titled "Percent of Admitted Febrile Infants receiving a Urinanlysis from January 2006 to July 2006: MK, PC, UV, and DX" is shown.

Image of a graph titled "Percent of Admitted Febrile Infants receiving a Urinalysis from January 2006 to July 2006: MK, PC, UV, and DX" is shown.

Slide 16

Median LOS for Febrile Infant Admissions with Negative Cultures by Admission Year

Median LOS for Febrile Infant Admissions with Negative Cultures by Admission Year

Median LOS (hours) MEDIAN(LOS_HRS)
Admit Year McKay-Dee Primary Children's Utah Valley Dixie
2002 58.5 53 94.5 72
2003 58 48 114 64
2004 61 47 95 60
2005 63 43 72 53
2006 52 47 68 54
2007 50.5 46 53 70
2008 46 43 46 48
2009 42 42 42 42

Slide 17

Evaluation of an Evidence-Based Care Process Model for Febrile Infants: Mixed Methods Study Aims

Evaluation of an Evidence-Based Care Process Model for Febrile Infants
Mixed Methods Study Aims

Semi-structured interviews to identify themes and unique aspects related to the implementation process, generating data to inform the spread

  • Hypothesis: the successful implementation of the EB-CPM at each facility required multiple and different factors as well as crosscutting themes.

Cost effectiveness of implementing the EB-CPM

Effect of offering the EB-CPM for Pediatric MOC

AHRQ 1 R18 HS018034-01, 7/1/09-6/30/11

Slide 18

Aim 1 Qualitative Analysis of Factors Related to Implementation of the EB-CPM

Aim 1 Qualitative Analysis of Factors Related to Implementation of the EB-CPM

The 7S Framework of McKinsey
 

Slide 19

Facility Context

Facility Context

Facility SystemRegion 2009 ER Visits 
PCMC(271 beds) Urban Central 46,331
Utah Valley(367 beds) Urban South 45,547
McKay Dee(311 beds) Urban North 65,193
Dixie Regional(245 beds) Southwest 40,430

All facilities are tertiary care, regional referral centers. Staffed beds noted.

Slide 20

Graph

7S Model Levers Intervention Elements Emergent Themes
Shared Value Board goal Visibility & leadership involvement: A corporate wide effort, supported by a Board goal helps---knowing that everyone is doing it.
Strategy Building evidence base; phased implementation; clinical champion visit MD championHaving a credible physician meeting in person with staff at their facilities to describe the evidence, rationale for CPM, and answer questions was important.
Structure Clinical integration/programs Resources: We have the clinical program infrastructure to determine priorities, identify solutions, and make decisions about focused efforts for change.
Systems CPM; decision support tools; informatics Tools: Providing documentation and support materials that are easily/readily accessible and that support or improve normal work flow. 
Style Feedback reports; monitoring Feedback (to involved staff); and monitoring with valid measures; tracking costs.
Staff Admin/managers, MDs, nurses, lab staff People: Involvement of nursing to make it happen! Physician buy-in. MOC
Skills Dx, process, lab tests Staff training (with refresher), alignment with laboratory 
 
Current as of December 2010
Internet Citation: Improving the Care of the Febrile Infant: Lessons Learned from AHRQ's Implementation Science Awards (Text Version). December 2010. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://archive.ahrq.gov/news/events/conference/2010/byington/index.html

 

The information on this page is archived and provided for reference purposes only.

 

AHRQ Advancing Excellence in Health Care