This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://info.ahrq.gov. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.
Please go to www.ahrq.gov for current information.
Keynote Founders' Award Address, by Carolyn
M. Clancy, M.D., Director, Agency for Healthcare Research
Medical Quality 2008, American College of Medical Quality Awards Luncheon, Austin, Texas, February 23, 2008
Hello, and thank you very much. It gives me
great pleasure to accept the American College of Medical Quality (ACMQ)
Founders' Award on behalf of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ).
Anything that we have accomplished has been the direct result of the work of
the many quality people who have invested their expertise in the Agency, so I
cannot in good conscience accept this award without acknowledging their
To be recognized by the College—one of the
pre-eminent organizations for leadership and education in health care quality
management—is quite an honor, not to mention joining a very distinguished list
of previous winners that includes Don Berwick, David Brailer, Janet Corrigan,
and many other extraordinary people.
ACMQ's engagement in research and
evaluation and the body of knowledge the organization provides has elevated the
standards in medical schools across the Nation. The scholarship program that you started
last year to bring student residents with an interest in quality to this
meeting is a great example of your commitment. You noticed there were few, if
any, student residency programs on quality, and you decided to find a way to
make a difference. This is a very insightful program on the
part of ACMQ, and I congratulate the winners for earning the opportunity to be
here. I also commend each one of you (residents) for your interest in quality.
The lack of educational curriculums on
quality is a pretty telling indication of the lengths we have to go to fix the U.S. health care system. Improving quality is pivotal to transforming our health care system. Secretary Leavitt often frames this
discussion by saying that we actually don't have a health care system. What we
have is a large, robust, rapidly growing health care sector.
Millions of Americans provide health care
or work in related businesses, but there is nothing that connects them to a
system. It's a serious problem when you consider that health care, perhaps the
most critical service, is one of the last vestiges of the paper-driven era.
Research from AHRQ's most recent National
Healthcare Quality Report shows that the rate of improvement in the system in
2006 was a modest 3.1 percent. The rate of increase in spending was nearly 7
percent, according to the National Health Expenditure Accounts. The annual cost of care in this country now
exceeds $2 trillion, and costs are expected to double within the next 10 years. This is not sustainable, and it's not the
worst part. The worst part is we're not delivering more than $2 trillion worth of
quality care. It's probably not even close.
I'm going to borrow from a recent story
that compared the work we need to do on the health care system to peeling an
onion. It said the onion is the right analogy for three reasons:
can make you cry.
time you pull off a layer you learn more.
you see from the outside is a lot different than what's on the
The impending retirement of 78 million Baby
Boomers (2010-2030) will exert tremendous pressure on our already challenged
system. If something is not done, a lot of tears are going to be shed very
soon. The average life expectancy of Baby Boomers
is 30 years longer than that for people who were born at the turn of the 20th century. This is evidence of considerable improvement. We have made strides, but
we have a long way to go and we're moving way too slowly.
To build on our efforts, we need to move beyond
the one-size-fits-all method of care. We need a robust system that includes
capacity for rapid translation of beneficial advances or breakthroughs and for identifying
and evaluating innovative strategies to improve the quality of care.
We need to analyze our capacity for:
What can work under ideal circumstances for some people.
Getting it right for all patients every time the first time.
enhancement: Translating research into improved patient care.
Some of the questions we need to ask:
clinical research arriving to the bedside as fast as it could?
we finding innovation in health care?
do we create value?
Here's the vision for health care: Over the
next decade or so we will have a real system in which doctors, hospitals,
pharmacies, and labs will be connected electronically. Patients will have access to cost and
quality comparisons on doctors and hospitals. These comparisons will be based
on standards developed by the medical family. Ultimately, we will have health
care competition based on value.
A revamped system will be built on four
standards: Systems that collect quality of care information and define what
constitutes quality health care.
standards: Aggregate claims information to enable cost comparisons between
specific doctors and hospital.
Rewards for those who provide and purchase high-quality and competitively
priced health care.
standards: Common technical standards that allow for various products to talk
to each other and exchange information securely.
The key to successful standards is
consensus, not government-mandated standards, but active agreement across a
wide spectrum of stakeholders about what works. We also need to engage our patients more
because at the end of the day the currency of our daily work with patients is
information and communication.
I believe that the recommendations we make
to patients should be what the patients would recommend for themselves, if they
had the necessary training and experience. This seems to be a readily attainable goal,
especially with all of the resources that are available to us today.
We've got the money to peel away the
layers. As I mentioned, we're spending more than $2 trillion annually. We've got the expertise. The United States has the world's finest physicians, nurses, and other health care workers. And we've got access to the latest tools,
with new and better ones being developed all the time.
We need to provide motivation for doctors
who may think that for them value-driven health care means more work for less
money. We need to figure out how to show the
business community more evidence of our pronouncements that a healthier
workforce is more efficient and cost-effective. Our patients need to understand how
important it is for them to ask questions of their care givers.
This is something that I take personally.
When you consider that the difference can be measured in lives saved how can it not be personal?
We now have patients who have easy and
quick access to the same kinds of information that we do. At times, they know
about new drugs for treating their conditions before we do. And they have expectations. To me, this spells opportunity.
More work? Possibly, but the important
issue here is that this is an opportunity for all of us to work collectively to
develop a system that makes the right thing the easy thing to do. And in order to do this, we must take
advantage of all available lessons learned—in and outside of the health care
system—as we move forward so that we can make the most of this chance to make
21st century health care an information-rich, patient-focused
enterprise in a value-driven environment.
Again, thank you very much for your
acknowledgement of the work that takes place at AHRQ. I am extremely pleased
and proud to be accepting this award. It is a moment that will bring fond
memories for many, many years to come.
Current as of February 2008