This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://info.ahrq.gov. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.
Please go to www.ahrq.gov for current information.
Strengthening the Rural Health Infrastructure
Medicaid Managed Care
In Rural Areas
Pam Silberman, Dr. P.H., J.D., Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North
Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Ilalynn Irwin, Regional Administrator, Division of Medical Services, Missouri Department of Social Services, Jefferson City, MI.
This session explored the development of Medicaid managed care programs in rural areas.
Dr. Silberman began by reviewing recent research findings on the extent and types of such programs in all 50 States,
which showed that as of May 1997:
- Only 2 States had no Medicaid managed care program.
- Forty-five States had at least one operational Medicaid managed care program that required a waiver.
- Primary care case management programs (PCCMs) were more common in rural areas; capitated plans in urban areas.
In looking at current program designs, Dr. Silberman noted that some States have capitated or PCCM programs statewide
and other States allow different programs in rural and urban areas (i.e., PCCM in most of the State with some capitation
limited to urban areas; capitation programs operating in most of the State and certain rural areas operating PCCM or
partial capitated programs; capitation programs available in both urban and rural areas but mandatory capitation limited to
The results seem related to barriers to statewide capitation such as the lack of commercial health maintenance organizations (HMOs) in rural
areas and lack of providers or provider resistance to managed care arrangements.
Dr. Silberman reviewed various State
strategies for overcoming these barriers such as changing their goals and using phased-in approaches, expanding the
definition of primary care providers, and engaging in extensive community education efforts to reduce provider resistance.
Also discussed was how States vary in their protections for so-called safety-net providers, (e.g., community health centers)
from no or minimal protections to giving managed care organizations (MCOs) extra points for contracting with safety-net providers or actually
mandating contracts with certain safety-net providers.
Missouri is an example of a full-risk State. Ms. Irwin discussed various functional aspects of that program such as rural
access standards. For example, the PCP (primary care provider) 20-mile standard cannot apply in rural areas where the
usual and customary is a greater distance. Usual and customary is based on a commercial market standard for the area.
Ms. Irwin shared the following lessons Missouri learned about Medicaid managed:
- The managed care contract is very important.
- Traditional providers must continue to be part of provider networks.
- Need to be flexible and have realistic expectations.
- Need to use a phased-in approach.
- Emphasize primary and preventive care and be willing to pay higher reimbursement rates.
Silberman P, et al. The Experience and Consequences of Medicaid Managed Care for Rural
Populations. Literature Synthesis, North Carolina Rural Health Research Program, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health
Services Research—The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Working paper, No. 51, July 20, 1997.
Previous Section Contents