Skip Navigation Archive: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services www.hhs.gov
Archive: Agency for Healthcare Research Quality www.ahrq.gov
Archive print banner

This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://info.ahrq.gov. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.

Please go to www.ahrq.gov for current information.

Addressing the Needs of the Uninsured in a Challenging Economic Environment

Slide Presentation by Anne Markus, J.D., Ph.D.


On March 14, 2002, Anne Markus, J.D., Ph.D., made a presentation in a Web-assisted teleconference at Session 3, which was entitled "Stretching Scarce Resources: State Strategies to Design Effective, Affordable Benefit Packages."

This is the text version of Dr. Markus's slide presentation. Select to access the PowerPoint® slides (289 KB).


Stretching Scarce Resources: State Strategies to Design Effective, Affordable Benefit Packages

Anne Markus, J.D., Ph.D.
Senior Research Scientist
The George Washington University Medical Center

Slide No. 1

Definitions

  • Premium: Set amount of dollars per defined payment period (usually monthly) paid to obtain health insurance coverage.
  • Cost-sharing: Patient exposure to out-of-pocket costs associated with health service delivery. Includes:
       -Deductible
       -Coinsurance
       -Copayment

Slide No. 2

Purposes of Cost-sharing

General reasons:

  • Enticing families to be more cost conscious in seeking care
  • Fostering a sense of ownership/personal responsibility
  • Directing consumers toward more cost-effective care
  • Deterring unnecessary utilization
  • Raising revenues to reduce sponsor costs of health care coverage

Slide No. 3

Purposes of Cost-sharing (cont.)

Additional reasons for states:

  • Making public health insurance programs aimed at the poor look more like private insurance
  • Limiting substitution and crowd-out of private insurance

Slide No. 4

Recent Trends

  • Private sector
      -No significant changes to contribution strategies, but changes to benefit structure
  • Medicaid/SCHIP (State Children's Health Insurance Program)
      -HIFA (Health Insurance Flexibility & Accountability) initiative
  • Medicare
      -Pharmacy Plus initiative

Slide No. 5

Cost-sharing Rules in Public Programs

Medicaid:

  • Premiums prohibited with some exceptions
  • "Nominal" cost-sharing allowed with some exceptions
  • No overall cap specificed

SCHIP:

  • Premiums allowed
  • Cost-sharing allowed
  • Overall cap of 5% of family income

State employee benefit plans:

  • Premiums allowed
  • Cost-sharing allowed
  • May or may not impose overall cap

Slide No. 6

Medicaid and SCHIP Waivers

  • Medicaid cost-sharing waivers:
      (1) inappropriate use of ER (emergency room)
      (2) 2 year demonstration program
  • Section 1115 waivers:
      (1) waiver of Medicaid and/or SCHIP cost-sharing requirements as part of a 5-year
            demonstration program
      (2) streamlined waiver process and increased flexibility to design cost-sharing rules under HIFA

Slide No. 7

Effect of Premiums

  • Premiums influence participation in insurance programs
  • As premiums increase, participation rates decrease

Slide No. 8

Effects of Cost-sharing

Use of services

  • Cost-sharing influences the use of services
  • As cost-sharing increases, use of services decreases
      -outpatient care
      -inpatient care
      -prescriptions
      -preventive services
      -emergency room

Health outcomes

  • Cost-sharing may have an effect on health outcomes
  • In general, cost-sharing has been found to have a minimal or no effect on health outcomes except for the poorest populations

Slide No. 9

Effect Across Population Groups

  • Research shows that cost-sharing has a deterrent effect across the board:
      -children and adults
      -people who are healthy and people who have chronic conditions
      -rich and poor
  • Existing body of knowledge also suggests that cost-sharing may have a more pronounced negative effect on low income people:
      -studies on premiums in state programs
      -non-Medicaid studies on cost-sharing
      -Medicaid studies on cost-sharing

Slide No. 10

SCHIP Experiences

  • All States with separate SCHIP programs have some form of cost-sharing
  • Research in this area thus far focuses on the effect of premiums on initial participation but also on continued participation in program
  • Anecdotal evidence also suggests that collecting and processing premiums and other cost-sharing contributions is administratively burdensome and/or not worth the cost

Slide No. 11

Implications

  • Income-related, sliding scale of premium and cost-sharing schedule
  • Low premiums
  • Limited cost-sharing
  • Broaden the definition of preventive services exempt from cost-sharing
  • Individuals with special needs

Slide No. 12

HIFA Cost-sharing Rules

  • Mandatory eligibility groups (e.g., all children up to 100% FPL): same rules as Medicaid
  • Optional eligibility groups (e.g., children beyond the mandatory eligibility levels): no cost-sharing rules specified other than an annual cap of 5% of family income for deductibles, copayments and coinsurance
  • "Expansion" eligibles (e.g., nondisabled single working age adults, childless couples): no cost-sharing rules specified

Slide No. 13

Examples of State Flexibility Under HIFA

  • Arizona (approved HIFA waiver):
      -Childless adults <100% FPL (Federal Poverty Level): same cost-sharing as Medicaid, i.e., $1-$5 except prenatal care, EPSDT
       services, family planning
      -Parents of SCHIP and Medicaid children 100-200% FPL: same cost-sharing as SCHIP, i.e., family
       premiums up to $25 per month, $5 non-emergency use of emergency room, overall limit of 5% of annual
       family income
  • California (approved HIFA waiver):
      -Parents of SCHIP and Medicaid children <200% FPL: similar to cost-sharing under SCHIP, e.g.,
       monthly premiums of $10 or $20, copays

Current as of July 2002


Internet Citation

Stretching Scarce Resources: State Strategies to Design Effective, Affordable Benefit Packages. Presentation by Anne Markus at Web-Assisted Teleconference, "Addressing the Needs of the Uninsured in a Challenging Economic Environment". July 2002. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/news/ulp/uninsuredtele/session3/markustxt.htm


Return to Teleconference

The information on this page is archived and provided for reference purposes only.

AHRQ Advancing Excellence in Health Care