This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://info.ahrq.gov. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.
Please go to www.ahrq.gov for current information.
Realizing the Promise of Value-based Purchasing
Analyzing Current Practices
Participants were asked to analyze their own States' current value-based purchasing efforts
and discuss ways they can fully realize their purchasing objectives. Small State team-specific
groups met and then convened as a whole to highlight some of the strengths, weaknesses,
threats, and opportunities relevant to their purchasing strategies.
Some of the strengths underlying States' present purchasing arrangements
- A heightened awareness of quality issues in many jurisdictions, and more leaders and
purchasers focusing on value over cost.
- Several States are looking to ensure more competition and choice of care across their
- Performance measures are being incorporated into provider agreements.
- States are collecting a lot of data including Health Plan Employer Data and Information
Set (HEDIS®) measures and Consumer Assessment of Health Plans (CAHPS®) and
are sharing these across State agencies.
These strengths are often offset by weaknesses that preclude States from being able to achieve their health care purchasing objectives. The weaknesses most often identified fall into four major areas:
- Poor communication. Plans and agencies lack communication and the ability to
coordinate around issues of quality.
- Data collection issues. States lack data (e.g., regarding variations in patterns of care,
or outcomes at the provider level), have inefficient means to collect data, and an excess
of data that can not be used for quality improvement.
- Challenges associated with designing effective value-based purchasing strategies
in rural areas. Providers are reluctant to engage in value-based purchasing, and
provider choice and health maintenance
organization (HMO) penetration are lacking in these areas.
- Problems with disseminating information. Information is not being shared broadly
enough to reach consumers and decisionmakers within agencies.
A number of environmental obstacles were identified that also affect States'
purchasing initiatives. One State faces potential negative actions from providers when it raises
concerns with them about saving money, while another State perceived problems arising from
State medical societies and hospital groups coalescing to blunt purchasing legislation. Budget
restrictions (i.e., spending caps) also pose a very real threat that prohibits States from using
funds as they would like.
States have begun to address these threats by acting upon opportunities that
may allow them to focus more on quality of care. Many States are infusing more value-based
principles into their purchasing efforts by:
- Becoming actively involved in coalition efforts, increasing their leverage in the health
care market by coordinating with other purchasers.
- Developing report cards and other reports to assist in making policy changes.
- Examining the potential for telemedicine, e-health, and other technologies to help
increase access to care in rural areas.
Previous Section Contents