Doing What
Counts for Patient Safety: Federal Actions to Reduce Medical Errors
and Their Impact
To
Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System, a report released
late last year by the Institute of Medicine (IOM), shocked the Nation
by estimating that up to 98,000 Americans die each year as a result
of preventable medical errors. The report concludes that the majority
of these errors are the result of systemic problems rather than
poor performance by individual providers, and outlined a four-pronged
approach to prevent medical mistakes and improve patient safety.
On December
7, President Clinton directed the Quality Interagency Coordination
Task Force (QuIC) to evaluate the recommendations in To Err is
Human and to respond with a strategy to identify prevalent threats
to patient safety and reduce medical errors. This report responds
to the President’s request and provides an action plan to implement
Administration initiatives designed to help prevent mistakes in
the Nation’s health care delivery system.
Return
to Contents
A National
Problem of Epidemic Proportion
It is clear
that, although the United States provides some of the best health
care in the world, the numbers of errors in health care are at unacceptably
high levels. The Institute of Medicine’s report estimates that more
than half of the adverse medical events occurring each year are
due to preventable medical errors, causing the death of tens of
thousands. The cost associated with these errors in lost income,
disability, and health care costs is as much as $29 billion annually.
The consequences of medical mistakes are often more severe than
the consequences of mistakes in other industriesleading to
death or disability rather than inconvenience on the part of consumersunderscoring
the need for aggressive action in this area.
A wide body
of research, including many studies funded by AHRQ, supports the
IOM conclusions. The two seminal studies on medical error (Brennan,
1991; Thomas, 1999) have shown
that adverse events occur to approximately 3–4 percent of patients.
In another study (Leape, 1994),
the average intensive care unit (ICU) patient experienced almost
two errors per day. This translates to a level of proficiency of
approximately 99 percent. One out of five of these errors were potentially
serious or fatal. If performance levels of 99.9 percentsubstantially
better than those found in the ICUapplied to the airline and
banking industries, it would equate to two dangerous landings per
day at O'Hare International Airport and 32,000 checks deducted from
the wrong account per hour (Leape,
1994).
Many of these
adverse events are associated with the use of pharmaceuticals, and
are potentially preventable. The IOM estimates the number of lives
lost to preventable medication errors alone represents over 7,000
deaths annuallymore than the number of Americans injured in
the workplace each year. In addition, preventable medication errors
are estimated to increase hospital costs by about $2 billion nationwide.
A 1995 study estimated that problems related to the use of pharmaceutical
drugs account for nearly 10 percent of all hospital admissions,
and significantly contribute to increased morbidity and mortality
in the United States (Bates, 1995).
A 1991 study of hospitals in New York State indicated that drug
complications represent 19 percent of all adverse events, and that
45 percent of these adverse events were caused by medical errors.
In this study, 30 percent of the individuals with drug-related injuries
died (Leape, 1991).
Return
to Contents
The Clinton-Gore
Administration’s Commitment to Improving Patient Safety
In early 1997,
the President established the Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection
and Quality in the Health Care Industry (Quality Commission) and
appointed Health and Human Services Secretary Shalala and Labor
Secretary Herman as co-chairs. The Quality Commission released two
seminal reports focusing on patient protections and quality improvement.
Subsequent to the Commission’s second report on patient safety and
quality improvement and consistent with its recommendations, the
President established the Quality Interagency Coordination Task
Force (QuIC), a umbrella organization also co-chaired by Secretary
Shalala and Secretary Herman, to coordinate Administration efforts
to improve quality. As he established the QuIC, the President stated
that "For all of its strengths, our health care system still
is plagued by avoidable errors."
Also consistent
with the Quality Commission’s recommendations, Vice President Gore
launched the National Forum for Health Care Quality Measurement
and Reporting. Known as the Quality Forum, it is a broad-based,
widely representative private body that establishes standard quality
measurement tools to help all purchasers, providers, and consumers
of health care better evaluate and ensure the delivery of quality
services. In addition to the work and significant potential of the
QuIC and Quality Forum, other Federal agencies have made significant
efforts to reduce medical errors and increase attention on patient
safety.
In accordance
with its recent reauthorization, the AHRQ is the lead agency for
the Federal government on quality in health care. It sponsors research
examining the frequency and cause of medical errors and tests techniques
designed to reduce these mistakes. It also examines issues generally
related to health care quality, including overuse and underuse of
services.
The Department
of Defense (DoD) and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), serving
over 11 million patients nationwide, have begun to implement computerized
physician order entry systems, proven effective in reducing medical
errors. In addition, Veterans Affairs has implemented a computerized
medical record in all their 172 hospitals, making it possible to
reduce errors by providing complete information about patients at
the point of care. Over the past 3 years, the VA created an error
reporting system, established four Centers of Inquiry for Patient
Safety, and began to use barcode technology to reduce medication
errors.
The Health Care
Financing Administration (HCFA), through its Peer Review Organizations
(PROs), is working to reduce errors of omission for the 39 million
Medicare beneficiaries. Under their current performance-based contracts,
the PROs are working to prevent failures and delays in delivering
services for breast cancer, diabetes, heart attack, heart failure,
pneumonia, and stroke. These efforts have already decreased mortality
for heart attack victims.
The Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) collect data on adverse events that are the result of treatment,
such as hospital-acquired infections and the unintended effects
of drugs and medical devices. CDC's National Nosocomial Infections
Surveillance (NNIS) system is a hospital-based reporting system
that monitors hospital-acquired infections that afflict more than
two million patients every year. Among participating hospitals,
bloodstream infection rates have decreased by more than 30 percent
since 1990, and wound infections following surgery have decreased
by 60 percent among high-risk patients. FDA receives approximately
100,000 reports per year of adverse events associated with medical
devices and over 250,000 reports associated with pharmaceuticals.
FDA estimates that over one-third of the adverse events associated
with medical devices and pharmaceuticals are preventable.
In all of these
efforts, the Administration has worked closely with the private
sector and the States. Many States and members of the private sector
are moving ahead with actions to reduce the number of medical errors.
Currently, almost 20 States have implemented mandatory reporting
systems to improve patient safety and hold health care organizations
responsible for the quality of care they provide. The private sector
has also taken large strides to address the issue of patient safety,
most recently with the creation of the Leapfrog Group by executives
of some of the Nation’s biggest companies, including General Motors
and General Electric. This group encourages all employers to make
safe medicine a top priority of the health insurance they provide
and to steer workers to the hospitals that make the fewest mistakes.
While both the
public and private sectors have made notable contributions to reducing
preventable medical errors, additional and aggressive efforts are
needed in and outside of the Federal government to further reduce
these mistakes.
Return
to Contents
Institute
of Medicine Recommendations
The IOM report
recommends the establishment of a national goal of reducing the
number of medical errors by 50 percent over 5 years. To that end,
it outlined a four-tiered approach to reduce medical mistakes nationwide,
including actions to:
- Establish
a national focus to create leadership, research, tools, and protocols
to enhance the knowledge base about safety.
- Identify
and learn from medical errors through both mandatory and voluntary
reporting systems.
- Raise standards
and expectations for improvements in safety through the actions
of oversight organizations, group purchasers, and professional
groups.
- Implement
safe practices at the delivery level.
Return
to Contents
A Road Map
for Action: The Federal Response
The QuIC agencies
join the IOM’s call for action to reduce errors, implement a system
of public accountability, develop a robust knowledge base about
medical errors, and change the culture in health care organizations
to promote the recognition of errors and improvement in patient
safety. This report describes the actions that the QuIC agencies
will take to build on current programs and develop new initiatives
to reduce errors.
The QuIC fully
endorses the IOM’s goal of reducing the number of medical mistakes
by 50 percent over 5 years and has developed a strategy that builds
on the IOM recommendations and, in some cases, goes beyond them.
This strategy is detailed below.
Return
to Contents
Creating
a National Focus to Enhance the Knowledge Base on Patient Safety
IOM Recommendation:
Creating a Center for Patient Safety. The IOM recommends that
Congress fund a Center for Patient Safety within the Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) that will set national goals
for patient safety, track progress in meeting these goals, and issue
an annual report to the President and Congress on patient safety.
The Center should also enhance the current knowledge base on patient
safety by developing a research agenda, disseminating grants for
research on patient safety, funding Centers of Excellence, evaluating
methods for identifying and preventing errors, and funding dissemination
and communication activities to improve patient safety.
QuIC Response.
The Administration endorses the IOM recommendation and the President
has included $20 million in the Fiscal Year (FY) 2001 budget to
support a Center for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety at the
AHRQ, as part of the Agency’s broader quality agenda. The Center
will fund research on medical errors, principally through extramural
grants and contracts. It will work with private-sector entities
and public sector partners, including the Quality Forum, to develop
national goals for patient safety; issue an annual report on the
state of patient safety nationally; promote the translation of research
findings into improved practices and policies; and educate patients,
consumers, and health care providers about patient safety.
IOM Recommendation:
Establishing reporting systems nationwide. The IOM recommends
that the Administration and the Congress move to establish a nationwide
system of error reporting that includes both mandatory and voluntary
components.
Mandatory
Reporting Systems. The IOM recommends the development of a nationwide
mandatory reporting system to provide for the collection of standardized
information by state governments about adverse events that result
in death or serious harm. The report states that adverse event reporting
should initially be required of hospitals and eventually be required
of other institutional and ambulatory care delivery systems. It
recommends that this system should be implemented nationwide, linked
to systems of accountability, and made available to the public.
The IOM concludes that if States choose not to implement the mandatory
reporting system, the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS)
should serve as the responsible entity.
Voluntary
Reporting Systems. The IOM report does not propose the establishment
of a national voluntary reporting system; rather, it offers a variety
of options for more limited voluntary reporting systems that function
in all 50 States and build on currently existing options, including
the development of systems focused on selected areas, such as medications,
surgery, and pediatrics or using a sampling technique to collect
the full range of information from a limited subset of health care
providers. The IOM recommends that more research be conducted to
determine the best way to develop voluntary reporting systems that
complement proposed mandatory reporting systems and can identify
potential precursors to errors, thus preventing patient harm. It
also recommends that the Congress extend peer review protections
to data related to patient safety and quality improvement collected
through voluntary reporting systems.
QuIC response.
The Administration agrees with the IOM that error reporting systems
should be established in all 50 States, and that these systems should
have both mandatory and voluntary components. Such an effort should
establish important complementary approaches to both learning and
accountability on errors. Well-designed patient safety programs
include reporting systems that both hold health systems accountable
for delivering high quality health care and provide important information
to health care decision-makers that improves patient safety.
The QuIC agrees
with the IOM that individuals should have access to information
leading up to and including the occurrence of a preventable error
that caused their serious injury or the death of a family member.
However, we believe that subsequent "root-cause" analyses
undertaken to determine the internal shortcomings of the hospital’s
delivery system should not be subject to discovery in litigation
and that appropriate legislation should be enacted in conjunction
with or prior to the implementation of mandatory or voluntary reporting
systems.
It is important
to note that the QuIC believes that any legislation or administrative
intervention in this area should not undermine individuals’ rights
to redress for criminal activity, malpractice, or negligence. The
QuIC does not support legislation that would allow safety reporting
systems to serve as a shield for providers engaging in illegal or
negligent behavior.
Mandatory
Reporting Systems. The QuIC supports the development of State-based
systems to require the collection of standardized information on
preventable, adverse events that result in death or serious harm,
and believes that the development of these systems are ultimately
in the best interests of patients. We agree with the IOM that the
scope of events targeted by mandatory reporting systems that contain
public disclosure components should be limited to serious, preventable,
and identifiable adverse events. By limiting required reporting
systems to the most serious of errorsthose causing life-long
disability or deaththis approach will most effectively target
egregious problems and minimize the cost of operating such a system.
The QuIC believes that, once mandatory systems are fully implemented,
such information for each health system should be consolidated and
made public, but that there should be no identification of patients
or individual health care professionals. The QuIC believes that
mandatory reporting systems that contain public disclosure components
should not be used as a tool for punitive action by State and local
authorities, but should be used as a mechanism to provide the public
with information about the safety of its health systems and to highlight
errors that can and should be prevented.
The IOM has
a set of specific recommendations for the structure of a nationwide
mandatory reporting system. The QuIC believes that there are a number
of issues that need to be addressed prior to determining the best
mechanism to ensure the establishment of State-based mandatory reporting
systems. The Administration will work with the Congress to outline
the appropriate Federal role in such a system. However, while these
issues are being resolved, the Administration will take the following
actions to demonstrate the importance of implementing mandatory
reporting systems and to create an environment in which there is
more widespread support for their use.
- Implement
a mandatory reporting system in the over 500 hospitals and clinics
operated by the Department of Defense. Beginning this spring,
the Department of Defense will implement a new reporting system
in its 500 hospitals and clinics serving approximately 8 million
patients. This confidential reporting system will be modeled on
the system in operation at the Department of Veterans Affairs
and will be used to provide health care professionals and facilities
with the information necessary to protect patient safety. This
system will begin to be pilot tested in August of 2000, will collect
information on adverse events, medication errors, close calls,
and other patient safety issues. DoD providers will inform affected
patients or their families when serious medical errors occur.
- Expand
mandatory reporting requirements for blood banks and establishments
that deal with blood products nationwide. By the end of the
year, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will release regulations
to improve the safety of blood transfusions by requiring the over
3,000 blood banks and establishments dealing with blood products
to report errors and accidents, such as mistyping blood products
and adverse events affecting donors, that affect patient safety.
Currently, only 400 blood banks are required to report such errors.
In addition
to Federal action to integrate mandatory reporting systems into
Federal agencies delivering care and strengthen the mandatory systems
that currently exist, there is a critical need for Federal leadership
in the development of patient safety standards. To that end, the
Federal government will:
- Identify
a set of patient safety measurements critical to the identification
of medical errors. The QuIC will ask the Quality Forum to
identify a set of patient safety measurements that should be a
basic component of any medical errors reporting system. Developing
standardized measures lays the foundation for a uniform system
of data collection and facilitates the development of these systems.
- Identify
a set of patient safety practices critical to prevention of medical
errors. The QuIC will ask the Quality Forum to identify, within
12 months, patient safety practices that should be adopted by
all hospitals and health systems, and will undertake activities
to encourage their widespread use. The QuIC suggests that mandatory
reporting systems include information on whether hospitals and
health systems' adopt these patient safety practices.
- Identify
issues related to the implementation of mandatory reporting for
error reduction. Using the Quality Forum’s recommendations
for medical error reporting, HCFA will develop a pilot project,
through the PRO program, for up to 100 hospitals that volunteer
to implement penalty-free, confidential, mandatory reporting systems.
These pilot projects will assist hospitals in changing their medical
delivery systems to reduce or eliminate errors. This pilot project
will include a rigorous evaluation component and identify issues
related to the implementation of medical error reporting systems.
- Determine
the most effective way to present information on the incidence
of medical errors to the public. HCFA, OPM, and AHRQ will
lead a QuIC effort to work with the Quality Forum and States that
have mandatory reporting systems to determine how data on medical
errors can be collected, validated, and presented to the general
public and local policy officialsand to determine the impact
of providing such information. Since informing the public about
the safety of their health care systems is a critical component
of mandatory reporting systems, this pilot project will provide
insights on presenting this information to the public.
- Examine
existing mandatory reporting systems. The Center for Quality
Improvement and Patient Safety, in collaboration with other QuIC
agencies, will evaluate the effectiveness of currently existing
mandatory reporting systems at the Federal and State levels and
develop recommendations to improve them. This information will
be presented to States and other organizations considering developing
such systems or that currently have existing systems, to help
them design effective reporting systems likely to improve patient
safety.
The QuIC believes
that these actions will encourage States to begin implementing their
own mandatory reporting systems for preventable adverse events,
with the goal that all 50 States have mandatory reporting systems
for preventable adverse events within 3 years. This time frame will
enable the Federal government, working with the Congress and other
private-sector stakeholders, to conclusively resolve outstanding
implementation issues. If all states have not implemented mandatory
reporting systems within three years, the QuIC will deliver recommendations
to the President that assure all health care institutions are reporting
serious, preventable adverse events.
Although currently
the QuIC believes that moving towards a mandatory reporting system
is the appropriate course of action, if research conducted by AHRQ
and other agencies indicates that the implementation of these systems
does not enhance (or detracts from) patient safety, these results
will be reported to the QuIC. Special emphasis will be placed on
efforts to determine whether making information public serves to
hold health systems accountable and reduce preventable errors, or
whether it only stifles reporting.
Voluntary
Reporting Systems. The QuIC agrees with the IOM that voluntary
reporting systems are a critical component of a national strategy
to reduce errors. Information from voluntary reporting systems is
usually gathered by an independent entity and is used to identify
patterns of errors. The QuIC proposes to integrate existing Federal
voluntary reporting systems with data collection efforts by States
and private organizations. The QuIC agrees with the IOM that these
programs should be confidential to protect the privacy of patients,
institutions, and providers reporting errors and close calls. Experience
in other industries demonstrates that confidentiality encourages
reporting. In order to encourage the development of voluntary reporting
systems, the Administration will:
- Implement
a voluntary reporting system nationwide for veterans’ hospitals.
The VA currently operates a mandatory reporting system. By
the end of the year, the VA will implement a voluntary reporting
system for both adverse events and close calls nationwide. Information
will be collected by an independent external entity, analyzed,
and disseminated to all VA health care networks to help prevent
medical errors. Implementing this system is likely to lead to
a richer database of information, as incidents are reported on
a de-identified basis, and will allow researchers to compare the
effectiveness of identified systems to de-identified ones.
- Examine
existing voluntary systems. The Center for Quality Improvement
and Patient Safety, with its QuIC partners, will evaluate the
effectiveness of existing voluntary reporting systems at the Federal
and State levels and develop recommendations to improve them.
This study will demonstrate which entity or entities would be
best to collect, analyze, and disseminate information on frequently
occurring errors and the best interventions to prevent them.
Return
to Contents
Setting Performance
Standards and Expectations for Safety
IOM Recommendation:
Include patient safety in performance standards and expectation
for health care organizations. The IOM recommends that regulators
and accreditors should require health care organizations to implement
meaningful patient safety programs with defined executive responsibility.
Public and private purchasers should provide incentives to health
care organizations to demonstrate continuous improvement in patient
safety.
QuIC response.
The QuIC reviewed current Federal activities and proposed several
ways to improve safety through current oversight activities. These
include:
- Assuring
that all hospitals participating in the Medicare program implement
patient safety programs. The Health Care Financing Administration
intends to publish regulations this year requiring the over 6000
hospitals participating in the Medicare program to have ongoing
medical error reduction programs that would include, among other
interventions, mechanisms to reduce medication errors. To comply
with this new regulation, most hospitals are likely to implement
systems such as automated pharmacy order-entry systems and automatic
safeguards against harmful drug interactions and other adverse
events.
- Requiring
the almost 300 health plans in the Federal Employees Health Benefits
Program to implement patient safety programs. In its annual
call letter, to be issued this April, the Office of Personnel
Management will announce that, beginning in 2001, all health plans
participating in the program will be required to implement patient
safety initiatives. OPM will encourage health plans to collaborate
with their providers to reduce errors and improve the quality
of care.
- Working
with private-sector employers and employees to incorporate patient
safety into purchasing decisions. This year, the Department
of Labor will include information on medical errors in the Health
Benefits Education Campaign. This national effort educates employees
about issues of quality and safety under their employer-provided
health benefits so that they can make informed health benefits
decisions and educates employers in order to facilitate the provision
of high-quality, affordable health benefits to their employees.
IOM Recommendation:
Performance standards and expectations for health professionals
should focus greater attention on patient safety. Periodic re-examination
and re-licensing of doctors, nurses, and other key providers should
be conducted based on both competence and knowledge of safety practices.
Professional societies should make a visible commitment to patient
safety by establishing a permanent committee dedicated to safety
improvement.
QuIC response.
The QuIC is supportive of these goals, but recognizes and agrees
with the IOM that they appropriately fall under State jurisdiction
and oversight. However, the QuIC agencies will provide technical
assistance to State or professional agencies seeking to ensure a
basic level of knowledge for health care providers on patient safety
issues, promote model patient safety programs that include evidence-based
best patient safety practices to provider organizations, or help
agencies encourage the cultural change necessary to make reporting
systems a success.
IOM Recommendation:
FDA should increase attention to the safe use of drugs. Both
pre- and postmarketing processes should be improved to maximize
safe drug use. FDA should develop and enforce standards for the
design of drug packaging and labeling that will maximize safety
in use and require pharmaceutical companies to test proposed drug
names to identify potential sources of confusion with existing drug
names. In addition, the Agency should work with physicians, pharmacists,
consumers, and others to establish appropriate responses to problems
identified through post-marketing surveillance activities.
QuIC response.
The QuIC endorses the IOM recommendation. FDA currently has
a strong program of pre- and post-market surveillance, and is pleased
that the President is committing $33 million, an increase of 65
percent over last year’s funding level, in his FY 2001 budget to
prevent medical errors associated with drugs and medical devices.
Among other things, it would:
Initiate
new efforts to ensure that pharmaceuticals are packaged and marketed
in a manner that promotes patient safety. Within one year, FDA
will develop new standards to help prevent medical errors caused
by proprietary drug names that sound similar or packaging that looks
similar, making it easy for health care providers to confuse medications.
The Agency will also develop new label standards by the end of the
year that highlight common drug-drug interactions and dosage errors
related to medications.
Return
to Contents
Implementing
Safety Systems in Health Care Organizations
IOM Recommendation:
Health care organizations should make continually improved patient
safety a declared and serious aim. Patient safety programs
should provide strong, clear, and visible attention to safety; implement
non-punitive systems for reporting and analyzing errors within their
organizations; and incorporate well-understood safety principles.
QuIC response.
The QuIC supports this recommendation, and Federal agencies
will take the following actions:
The Department
of Veterans Affairs. The VA is considered one of the Nation’s
leaders in patient safety, having instituted patient safety programs
in all of its health care facilities serving 3.8 million patients
nationwide. This year, the VA will invest over $47.6 million to
increase the requirement for patient safety training for staff from
15 to 20 hours a year, provide "VA Quality Scholars" fellowships
for 10 physicians, implement a patient safety awards program, and
place "patient safety checklists" in operating rooms in
every hospital nationwide.
The Department
of Defense. Beginning this fall, the Department of Defense will
invest $64 million in FY 2001 to begin the implementation of a new
computerized medical record, including an automated entry order
system for pharmaceuticals, that makes all relevant clinical information
on a patient available when and where it is needed. It will be phased
in at all DoD facilities over 3 years.
The QuIC
Task Force. This summer, the QuIC member agencies, including
DoD, VA, AHRQ, and HCFA, will begin a collaborative project with
the QuIC Task Force and the Institute for Healthcare Improvement
to reduce errors in "high hazard areas," such as emergency
rooms, operating rooms, intensive care units, and labor and delivery
units.
IOM Recommendation:
Improve medication safety. Health care organizations should
implement proven medication safety practices.
QuIC Response.
The QuIC endorses this recommendation. This year, VA will invest
$75.1 million to complete the implementation of an automated order
entry system in all of its health care facilities, along with a
barcoding system for blood transfusions and medication administration.
A 1999 evaluation of this system indicates that it has reduced medication
errors by 67 percent since its implementation. The Department of
Defense will invest $12 million to implement an integrated pharmacy
system that creates a single profile for all the medications a patient
takes, regardless of whether the prescriptions were filled at military
and private pharmacies serving DoD beneficiaries worldwide by the
end of 2000.
In addition,
to comply with the new proposed requirement that hospitals participating
in the Medicare program have error reduction programs, hospitals
are likely to implement programs such as automated pharmacy order-entry
systems. Furthermore, as highlighted in the prescription drug provisions
in the President’s Medicare reform initiative, any outpatient drug
benefit for Medicare beneficiaries should require private contractors
administering the program to use the latest patient safety techniques,
including drug utilization review and patient counseling.
Return
to Contents
Additional
Federal Actions to Improve Patient Safety
The President
asked the QuIC to identify additional strategies to reduce medical
errors and ensure patient safety in Federal health care programs.
This report includes several additional recommendations, including
an emphasis on the application of information systems and computer-based
initiatives to improve patient safety. The President has requested
$20 million in his FY 2001 budget to develop a consistent structure
for health care information technology that incorporates strong
privacy protections for patients and providers. Investments in information
technology are one of the most effective and efficient ways to improve
the quality of health care. This Health Informatics Initiative will
address the problem of medical errors as a part of the Administration's
efforts to improve health care quality through enhanced information
technology.
Return
to Contents
Conclusion
In this report,
the QuIC proposes to take strong action on each and every one of
the IOM recommendations to promote safer health care. While some
of the IOM’s recommendations can be addressed individually by specific
agencies, the majority of the proposed actions require joint effort.
The QuIC and its participating agencies are eager to partner with
a broad array of public, state, and private organizations in a national
effort to reduce medical errors and improve patient safety.
Return
to Contents
Proceed to Next Section
Executive
Summary and Actions
Doing What
Counts for Patient Safety: Federal Actions to Reduce Medical Errors
and Their Impact
To
Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System, a report released
late last year by the Institute of Medicine (IOM), shocked the Nation
by estimating that up to 98,000 Americans die each year as a result
of preventable medical errors. The report concludes that the majority
of these errors are the result of systemic problems rather than
poor performance by individual providers, and outlined a four-pronged
approach to prevent medical mistakes and improve patient safety.
On December
7, President Clinton directed the Quality Interagency Coordination
Task Force (QuIC) to evaluate the recommendations in To Err is
Human and to respond with a strategy to identify prevalent threats
to patient safety and reduce medical errors. This report responds
to the President’s request and provides an action plan to implement
Administration initiatives designed to help prevent mistakes in
the Nation’s health care delivery system.
Return
to Contents
A National
Problem of Epidemic Proportion
It is clear
that, although the United States provides some of the best health
care in the world, the numbers of errors in health care are at unacceptably
high levels. The Institute of Medicine’s report estimates that more
than half of the adverse medical events occurring each year are
due to preventable medical errors, causing the death of tens of
thousands. The cost associated with these errors in lost income,
disability, and health care costs is as much as $29 billion annually.
The consequences of medical mistakes are often more severe than
the consequences of mistakes in other industriesleading to
death or disability rather than inconvenience on the part of consumersunderscoring
the need for aggressive action in this area.
A wide body
of research, including many studies funded by AHRQ, supports the
IOM conclusions. The two seminal studies on medical error (Brennan,
1991; Thomas, 1999) have shown
that adverse events occur to approximately 3–4 percent of patients.
In another study (Leape, 1994),
the average intensive care unit (ICU) patient experienced almost
two errors per day. This translates to a level of proficiency of
approximately 99 percent. One out of five of these errors were potentially
serious or fatal. If performance levels of 99.9 percentsubstantially
better than those found in the ICUapplied to the airline and
banking industries, it would equate to two dangerous landings per
day at O'Hare International Airport and 32,000 checks deducted from
the wrong account per hour (Leape,
1994).
Many of these
adverse events are associated with the use of pharmaceuticals, and
are potentially preventable. The IOM estimates the number of lives
lost to preventable medication errors alone represents over 7,000
deaths annuallymore than the number of Americans injured in
the workplace each year. In addition, preventable medication errors
are estimated to increase hospital costs by about $2 billion nationwide.
A 1995 study estimated that problems related to the use of pharmaceutical
drugs account for nearly 10 percent of all hospital admissions,
and significantly contribute to increased morbidity and mortality
in the United States (Bates, 1995).
A 1991 study of hospitals in New York State indicated that drug
complications represent 19 percent of all adverse events, and that
45 percent of these adverse events were caused by medical errors.
In this study, 30 percent of the individuals with drug-related injuries
died (Leape, 1991).
Return
to Contents
The Clinton-Gore
Administration’s Commitment to Improving Patient Safety
In early 1997,
the President established the Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection
and Quality in the Health Care Industry (Quality Commission) and
appointed Health and Human Services Secretary Shalala and Labor
Secretary Herman as co-chairs. The Quality Commission released two
seminal reports focusing on patient protections and quality improvement.
Subsequent to the Commission’s second report on patient safety and
quality improvement and consistent with its recommendations, the
President established the Quality Interagency Coordination Task
Force (QuIC), a umbrella organization also co-chaired by Secretary
Shalala and Secretary Herman, to coordinate Administration efforts
to improve quality. As he established the QuIC, the President stated
that "For all of its strengths, our health care system still
is plagued by avoidable errors."
Also consistent
with the Quality Commission’s recommendations, Vice President Gore
launched the National Forum for Health Care Quality Measurement
and Reporting. Known as the Quality Forum, it is a broad-based,
widely representative private body that establishes standard quality
measurement tools to help all purchasers, providers, and consumers
of health care better evaluate and ensure the delivery of quality
services. In addition to the work and significant potential of the
QuIC and Quality Forum, other Federal agencies have made significant
efforts to reduce medical errors and increase attention on patient
safety.
In accordance
with its recent reauthorization, the AHRQ is the lead agency for
the Federal government on quality in health care. It sponsors research
examining the frequency and cause of medical errors and tests techniques
designed to reduce these mistakes. It also examines issues generally
related to health care quality, including overuse and underuse of
services.
The Department
of Defense (DoD) and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), serving
over 11 million patients nationwide, have begun to implement computerized
physician order entry systems, proven effective in reducing medical
errors. In addition, Veterans Affairs has implemented a computerized
medical record in all their 172 hospitals, making it possible to
reduce errors by providing complete information about patients at
the point of care. Over the past 3 years, the VA created an error
reporting system, established four Centers of Inquiry for Patient
Safety, and began to use barcode technology to reduce medication
errors.
The Health Care
Financing Administration (HCFA), through its Peer Review Organizations
(PROs), is working to reduce errors of omission for the 39 million
Medicare beneficiaries. Under their current performance-based contracts,
the PROs are working to prevent failures and delays in delivering
services for breast cancer, diabetes, heart attack, heart failure,
pneumonia, and stroke. These efforts have already decreased mortality
for heart attack victims.
The Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) collect data on adverse events that are the result of treatment,
such as hospital-acquired infections and the unintended effects
of drugs and medical devices. CDC's National Nosocomial Infections
Surveillance (NNIS) system is a hospital-based reporting system
that monitors hospital-acquired infections that afflict more than
two million patients every year. Among participating hospitals,
bloodstream infection rates have decreased by more than 30 percent
since 1990, and wound infections following surgery have decreased
by 60 percent among high-risk patients. FDA receives approximately
100,000 reports per year of adverse events associated with medical
devices and over 250,000 reports associated with pharmaceuticals.
FDA estimates that over one-third of the adverse events associated
with medical devices and pharmaceuticals are preventable.
In all of these
efforts, the Administration has worked closely with the private
sector and the States. Many States and members of the private sector
are moving ahead with actions to reduce the number of medical errors.
Currently, almost 20 States have implemented mandatory reporting
systems to improve patient safety and hold health care organizations
responsible for the quality of care they provide. The private sector
has also taken large strides to address the issue of patient safety,
most recently with the creation of the Leapfrog Group by executives
of some of the Nation’s biggest companies, including General Motors
and General Electric. This group encourages all employers to make
safe medicine a top priority of the health insurance they provide
and to steer workers to the hospitals that make the fewest mistakes.
While both the
public and private sectors have made notable contributions to reducing
preventable medical errors, additional and aggressive efforts are
needed in and outside of the Federal government to further reduce
these mistakes.
Return
to Contents
Institute
of Medicine Recommendations
The IOM report
recommends the establishment of a national goal of reducing the
number of medical errors by 50 percent over 5 years. To that end,
it outlined a four-tiered approach to reduce medical mistakes nationwide,
including actions to:
- Establish
a national focus to create leadership, research, tools, and protocols
to enhance the knowledge base about safety.
- Identify
and learn from medical errors through both mandatory and voluntary
reporting systems.
- Raise standards
and expectations for improvements in safety through the actions
of oversight organizations, group purchasers, and professional
groups.
- Implement
safe practices at the delivery level.
Return
to Contents
A Road Map
for Action: The Federal Response
The QuIC agencies
join the IOM’s call for action to reduce errors, implement a system
of public accountability, develop a robust knowledge base about
medical errors, and change the culture in health care organizations
to promote the recognition of errors and improvement in patient
safety. This report describes the actions that the QuIC agencies
will take to build on current programs and develop new initiatives
to reduce errors.
The QuIC fully
endorses the IOM’s goal of reducing the number of medical mistakes
by 50 percent over 5 years and has developed a strategy that builds
on the IOM recommendations and, in some cases, goes beyond them.
This strategy is detailed below.
Return
to Contents
Creating
a National Focus to Enhance the Knowledge Base on Patient Safety
IOM Recommendation:
Creating a Center for Patient Safety. The IOM recommends that
Congress fund a Center for Patient Safety within the Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) that will set national goals
for patient safety, track progress in meeting these goals, and issue
an annual report to the President and Congress on patient safety.
The Center should also enhance the current knowledge base on patient
safety by developing a research agenda, disseminating grants for
research on patient safety, funding Centers of Excellence, evaluating
methods for identifying and preventing errors, and funding dissemination
and communication activities to improve patient safety.
QuIC Response.
The Administration endorses the IOM recommendation and the President
has included $20 million in the Fiscal Year (FY) 2001 budget to
support a Center for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety at the
AHRQ, as part of the Agency’s broader quality agenda. The Center
will fund research on medical errors, principally through extramural
grants and contracts. It will work with private-sector entities
and public sector partners, including the Quality Forum, to develop
national goals for patient safety; issue an annual report on the
state of patient safety nationally; promote the translation of research
findings into improved practices and policies; and educate patients,
consumers, and health care providers about patient safety.
IOM Recommendation:
Establishing reporting systems nationwide. The IOM recommends
that the Administration and the Congress move to establish a nationwide
system of error reporting that includes both mandatory and voluntary
components.
Mandatory
Reporting Systems. The IOM recommends the development of a nationwide
mandatory reporting system to provide for the collection of standardized
information by state governments about adverse events that result
in death or serious harm. The report states that adverse event reporting
should initially be required of hospitals and eventually be required
of other institutional and ambulatory care delivery systems. It
recommends that this system should be implemented nationwide, linked
to systems of accountability, and made available to the public.
The IOM concludes that if States choose not to implement the mandatory
reporting system, the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS)
should serve as the responsible entity.
Voluntary
Reporting Systems. The IOM report does not propose the establishment
of a national voluntary reporting system; rather, it offers a variety
of options for more limited voluntary reporting systems that function
in all 50 States and build on currently existing options, including
the development of systems focused on selected areas, such as medications,
surgery, and pediatrics or using a sampling technique to collect
the full range of information from a limited subset of health care
providers. The IOM recommends that more research be conducted to
determine the best way to develop voluntary reporting systems that
complement proposed mandatory reporting systems and can identify
potential precursors to errors, thus preventing patient harm. It
also recommends that the Congress extend peer review protections
to data related to patient safety and quality improvement collected
through voluntary reporting systems.
QuIC response.
The Administration agrees with the IOM that error reporting systems
should be established in all 50 States, and that these systems should
have both mandatory and voluntary components. Such an effort should
establish important complementary approaches to both learning and
accountability on errors. Well-designed patient safety programs
include reporting systems that both hold health systems accountable
for delivering high quality health care and provide important information
to health care decision-makers that improves patient safety.
The QuIC agrees
with the IOM that individuals should have access to information
leading up to and including the occurrence of a preventable error
that caused their serious injury or the death of a family member.
However, we believe that subsequent "root-cause" analyses
undertaken to determine the internal shortcomings of the hospital’s
delivery system should not be subject to discovery in litigation
and that appropriate legislation should be enacted in conjunction
with or prior to the implementation of mandatory or voluntary reporting
systems.
It is important
to note that the QuIC believes that any legislation or administrative
intervention in this area should not undermine individuals’ rights
to redress for criminal activity, malpractice, or negligence. The
QuIC does not support legislation that would allow safety reporting
systems to serve as a shield for providers engaging in illegal or
negligent behavior.
Mandatory
Reporting Systems. The QuIC supports the development of State-based
systems to require the collection of standardized information on
preventable, adverse events that result in death or serious harm,
and believes that the development of these systems are ultimately
in the best interests of patients. We agree with the IOM that the
scope of events targeted by mandatory reporting systems that contain
public disclosure components should be limited to serious, preventable,
and identifiable adverse events. By limiting required reporting
systems to the most serious of errorsthose causing life-long
disability or deaththis approach will most effectively target
egregious problems and minimize the cost of operating such a system.
The QuIC believes that, once mandatory systems are fully implemented,
such information for each health system should be consolidated and
made public, but that there should be no identification of patients
or individual health care professionals. The QuIC believes that
mandatory reporting systems that contain public disclosure components
should not be used as a tool for punitive action by State and local
authorities, but should be used as a mechanism to provide the public
with information about the safety of its health systems and to highlight
errors that can and should be prevented.
The IOM has
a set of specific recommendations for the structure of a nationwide
mandatory reporting system. The QuIC believes that there are a number
of issues that need to be addressed prior to determining the best
mechanism to ensure the establishment of State-based mandatory reporting
systems. The Administration will work with the Congress to outline
the appropriate Federal role in such a system. However, while these
issues are being resolved, the Administration will take the following
actions to demonstrate the importance of implementing mandatory
reporting systems and to create an environment in which there is
more widespread support for their use.
- Implement
a mandatory reporting system in the over 500 hospitals and clinics
operated by the Department of Defense. Beginning this spring,
the Department of Defense will implement a new reporting system
in its 500 hospitals and clinics serving approximately 8 million
patients. This confidential reporting system will be modeled on
the system in operation at the Department of Veterans Affairs
and will be used to provide health care professionals and facilities
with the information necessary to protect patient safety. This
system will begin to be pilot tested in August of 2000, will collect
information on adverse events, medication errors, close calls,
and other patient safety issues. DoD providers will inform affected
patients or their families when serious medical errors occur.
- Expand
mandatory reporting requirements for blood banks and establishments
that deal with blood products nationwide. By the end of the
year, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will release regulations
to improve the safety of blood transfusions by requiring the over
3,000 blood banks and establishments dealing with blood products
to report errors and accidents, such as mistyping blood products
and adverse events affecting donors, that affect patient safety.
Currently, only 400 blood banks are required to report such errors.
In addition
to Federal action to integrate mandatory reporting systems into
Federal agencies delivering care and strengthen the mandatory systems
that currently exist, there is a critical need for Federal leadership
in the development of patient safety standards. To that end, the
Federal government will:
- Identify
a set of patient safety measurements critical to the identification
of medical errors. The QuIC will ask the Quality Forum to
identify a set of patient safety measurements that should be a
basic component of any medical errors reporting system. Developing
standardized measures lays the foundation for a uniform system
of data collection and facilitates the development of these systems.
- Identify
a set of patient safety practices critical to prevention of medical
errors. The QuIC will ask the Quality Forum to identify, within
12 months, patient safety practices that should be adopted by
all hospitals and health systems, and will undertake activities
to encourage their widespread use. The QuIC suggests that mandatory
reporting systems include information on whether hospitals and
health systems' adopt these patient safety practices.
- Identify
issues related to the implementation of mandatory reporting for
error reduction. Using the Quality Forum’s recommendations
for medical error reporting, HCFA will develop a pilot project,
through the PRO program, for up to 100 hospitals that volunteer
to implement penalty-free, confidential, mandatory reporting systems.
These pilot projects will assist hospitals in changing their medical
delivery systems to reduce or eliminate errors. This pilot project
will include a rigorous evaluation component and identify issues
related to the implementation of medical error reporting systems.
- Determine
the most effective way to present information on the incidence
of medical errors to the public. HCFA, OPM, and AHRQ will
lead a QuIC effort to work with the Quality Forum and States that
have mandatory reporting systems to determine how data on medical
errors can be collected, validated, and presented to the general
public and local policy officialsand to determine the impact
of providing such information. Since informing the public about
the safety of their health care systems is a critical component
of mandatory reporting systems, this pilot project will provide
insights on presenting this information to the public.
- Examine
existing mandatory reporting systems. The Center for Quality
Improvement and Patient Safety, in collaboration with other QuIC
agencies, will evaluate the effectiveness of currently existing
mandatory reporting systems at the Federal and State levels and
develop recommendations to improve them. This information will
be presented to States and other organizations considering developing
such systems or that currently have existing systems, to help
them design effective reporting systems likely to improve patient
safety.
The QuIC believes
that these actions will encourage States to begin implementing their
own mandatory reporting systems for preventable adverse events,
with the goal that all 50 States have mandatory reporting systems
for preventable adverse events within 3 years. This time frame will
enable the Federal government, working with the Congress and other
private-sector stakeholders, to conclusively resolve outstanding
implementation issues. If all states have not implemented mandatory
reporting systems within three years, the QuIC will deliver recommendations
to the President that assure all health care institutions are reporting
serious, preventable adverse events.
Although currently
the QuIC believes that moving towards a mandatory reporting system
is the appropriate course of action, if research conducted by AHRQ
and other agencies indicates that the implementation of these systems
does not enhance (or detracts from) patient safety, these results
will be reported to the QuIC. Special emphasis will be placed on
efforts to determine whether making information public serves to
hold health systems accountable and reduce preventable errors, or
whether it only stifles reporting.
Voluntary
Reporting Systems. The QuIC agrees with the IOM that voluntary
reporting systems are a critical component of a national strategy
to reduce errors. Information from voluntary reporting systems is
usually gathered by an independent entity and is used to identify
patterns of errors. The QuIC proposes to integrate existing Federal
voluntary reporting systems with data collection efforts by States
and private organizations. The QuIC agrees with the IOM that these
programs should be confidential to protect the privacy of patients,
institutions, and providers reporting errors and close calls. Experience
in other industries demonstrates that confidentiality encourages
reporting. In order to encourage the development of voluntary reporting
systems, the Administration will:
- Implement
a voluntary reporting system nationwide for veterans’ hospitals.
The VA currently operates a mandatory reporting system. By
the end of the year, the VA will implement a voluntary reporting
system for both adverse events and close calls nationwide. Information
will be collected by an independent external entity, analyzed,
and disseminated to all VA health care networks to help prevent
medical errors. Implementing this system is likely to lead to
a richer database of information, as incidents are reported on
a de-identified basis, and will allow researchers to compare the
effectiveness of identified systems to de-identified ones.
- Examine
existing voluntary systems. The Center for Quality Improvement
and Patient Safety, with its QuIC partners, will evaluate the
effectiveness of existing voluntary reporting systems at the Federal
and State levels and develop recommendations to improve them.
This study will demonstrate which entity or entities would be
best to collect, analyze, and disseminate information on frequently
occurring errors and the best interventions to prevent them.
Return
to Contents
Setting Performance
Standards and Expectations for Safety
IOM Recommendation:
Include patient safety in performance standards and expectation
for health care organizations. The IOM recommends that regulators
and accreditors should require health care organizations to implement
meaningful patient safety programs with defined executive responsibility.
Public and private purchasers should provide incentives to health
care organizations to demonstrate continuous improvement in patient
safety.
QuIC response.
The QuIC reviewed current Federal activities and proposed several
ways to improve safety through current oversight activities. These
include:
- Assuring
that all hospitals participating in the Medicare program implement
patient safety programs. The Health Care Financing Administration
intends to publish regulations this year requiring the over 6000
hospitals participating in the Medicare program to have ongoing
medical error reduction programs that would include, among other
interventions, mechanisms to reduce medication errors. To comply
with this new regulation, most hospitals are likely to implement
systems such as automated pharmacy order-entry systems and automatic
safeguards against harmful drug interactions and other adverse
events.
- Requiring
the almost 300 health plans in the Federal Employees Health Benefits
Program to implement patient safety programs. In its annual
call letter, to be issued this April, the Office of Personnel
Management will announce that, beginning in 2001, all health plans
participating in the program will be required to implement patient
safety initiatives. OPM will encourage health plans to collaborate
with their providers to reduce errors and improve the quality
of care.
- Working
with private-sector employers and employees to incorporate patient
safety into purchasing decisions. This year, the Department
of Labor will include information on medical errors in the Health
Benefits Education Campaign. This national effort educates employees
about issues of quality and safety under their employer-provided
health benefits so that they can make informed health benefits
decisions and educates employers in order to facilitate the provision
of high-quality, affordable health benefits to their employees.
IOM Recommendation:
Performance standards and expectations for health professionals
should focus greater attention on patient safety. Periodic re-examination
and re-licensing of doctors, nurses, and other key providers should
be conducted based on both competence and knowledge of safety practices.
Professional societies should make a visible commitment to patient
safety by establishing a permanent committee dedicated to safety
improvement.
QuIC response.
The QuIC is supportive of these goals, but recognizes and agrees
with the IOM that they appropriately fall under State jurisdiction
and oversight. However, the QuIC agencies will provide technical
assistance to State or professional agencies seeking to ensure a
basic level of knowledge for health care providers on patient safety
issues, promote model patient safety programs that include evidence-based
best patient safety practices to provider organizations, or help
agencies encourage the cultural change necessary to make reporting
systems a success.
IOM Recommendation:
FDA should increase attention to the safe use of drugs. Both
pre- and postmarketing processes should be improved to maximize
safe drug use. FDA should develop and enforce standards for the
design of drug packaging and labeling that will maximize safety
in use and require pharmaceutical companies to test proposed drug
names to identify potential sources of confusion with existing drug
names. In addition, the Agency should work with physicians, pharmacists,
consumers, and others to establish appropriate responses to problems
identified through post-marketing surveillance activities.
QuIC response.
The QuIC endorses the IOM recommendation. FDA currently has
a strong program of pre- and post-market surveillance, and is pleased
that the President is committing $33 million, an increase of 65
percent over last year’s funding level, in his FY 2001 budget to
prevent medical errors associated with drugs and medical devices.
Among other things, it would:
Initiate
new efforts to ensure that pharmaceuticals are packaged and marketed
in a manner that promotes patient safety. Within one year, FDA
will develop new standards to help prevent medical errors caused
by proprietary drug names that sound similar or packaging that looks
similar, making it easy for health care providers to confuse medications.
The Agency will also develop new label standards by the end of the
year that highlight common drug-drug interactions and dosage errors
related to medications.
Return
to Contents
Implementing
Safety Systems in Health Care Organizations
IOM Recommendation:
Health care organizations should make continually improved patient
safety a declared and serious aim. Patient safety programs
should provide strong, clear, and visible attention to safety; implement
non-punitive systems for reporting and analyzing errors within their
organizations; and incorporate well-understood safety principles.
QuIC response.
The QuIC supports this recommendation, and Federal agencies
will take the following actions:
The Department
of Veterans Affairs. The VA is considered one of the Nation’s
leaders in patient safety, having instituted patient safety programs
in all of its health care facilities serving 3.8 million patients
nationwide. This year, the VA will invest over $47.6 million to
increase the requirement for patient safety training for staff from
15 to 20 hours a year, provide "VA Quality Scholars" fellowships
for 10 physicians, implement a patient safety awards program, and
place "patient safety checklists" in operating rooms in
every hospital nationwide.
The Department
of Defense. Beginning this fall, the Department of Defense will
invest $64 million in FY 2001 to begin the implementation of a new
computerized medical record, including an automated entry order
system for pharmaceuticals, that makes all relevant clinical information
on a patient available when and where it is needed. It will be phased
in at all DoD facilities over 3 years.
The QuIC
Task Force. This summer, the QuIC member agencies, including
DoD, VA, AHRQ, and HCFA, will begin a collaborative project with
the QuIC Task Force and the Institute for Healthcare Improvement
to reduce errors in "high hazard areas," such as emergency
rooms, operating rooms, intensive care units, and labor and delivery
units.
IOM Recommendation:
Improve medication safety. Health care organizations should
implement proven medication safety practices.
QuIC Response.
The QuIC endorses this recommendation. This year, VA will invest
$75.1 million to complete the implementation of an automated order
entry system in all of its health care facilities, along with a
barcoding system for blood transfusions and medication administration.
A 1999 evaluation of this system indicates that it has reduced medication
errors by 67 percent since its implementation. The Department of
Defense will invest $12 million to implement an integrated pharmacy
system that creates a single profile for all the medications a patient
takes, regardless of whether the prescriptions were filled at military
and private pharmacies serving DoD beneficiaries worldwide by the
end of 2000.
In addition,
to comply with the new proposed requirement that hospitals participating
in the Medicare program have error reduction programs, hospitals
are likely to implement programs such as automated pharmacy order-entry
systems. Furthermore, as highlighted in the prescription drug provisions
in the President’s Medicare reform initiative, any outpatient drug
benefit for Medicare beneficiaries should require private contractors
administering the program to use the latest patient safety techniques,
including drug utilization review and patient counseling.
Return
to Contents
Additional
Federal Actions to Improve Patient Safety
The President
asked the QuIC to identify additional strategies to reduce medical
errors and ensure patient safety in Federal health care programs.
This report includes several additional recommendations, including
an emphasis on the application of information systems and computer-based
initiatives to improve patient safety. The President has requested
$20 million in his FY 2001 budget to develop a consistent structure
for health care information technology that incorporates strong
privacy protections for patients and providers. Investments in information
technology are one of the most effective and efficient ways to improve
the quality of health care. This Health Informatics Initiative will
address the problem of medical errors as a part of the Administration's
efforts to improve health care quality through enhanced information
technology.
Return
to Contents
Conclusion
In this report,
the QuIC proposes to take strong action on each and every one of
the IOM recommendations to promote safer health care. While some
of the IOM’s recommendations can be addressed individually by specific
agencies, the majority of the proposed actions require joint effort.
The QuIC and its participating agencies are eager to partner with
a broad array of public, state, and private organizations in a national
effort to reduce medical errors and improve patient safety.
Return
to Contents
Proceed to Next Section
|