Skip Navigation U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Agency for Healthcare Research Quality
Archive print banner


This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.

Please go to for current information.

Task Force finds evidence lacking on whether routine screening for prostate cancer improves health outcomes

Although screening for prostate cancer is a common part of a routine checkup for American men, a new finding issued recently by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force concludes there is insufficient scientific evidence to promote routine screening for all men and inconclusive evidence that early detection improves health outcomes.

The Task Force, an independent panel of experts sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, reviewed studies on the effect of screening for prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests and digital rectal exams to prevent death in men over the age of 40. The Task Force found that although the tests are effective for detecting disease, there is insufficient evidence that they improve long-term health outcomes.

Over their lifetime, 15 percent of U.S. men eventually will be diagnosed with prostate cancer, and three-fourths of these men will be diagnosed after age 65. A man in the United States has a 3 percent chance of dying from prostate cancer. Because prostate cancer usually grows slowly, many men diagnosed with the disease will die of other causes, especially men who are older than 65 when they are diagnosed.

If clinicians opt to perform prostate cancer screening for individual patients, the Task Force recommends that they first discuss the uncertain benefits and possible harms. Benefits of the tests may include early detection of cancer, but harms may include false-positive results and unnecessary anxiety, biopsies, and potential complications of treating some early cancers that may never have affected a patient's health or well being. Potential side effects of surgery and radiation treatment include erectile dysfunction, urinary incontinence, and bowel dysfunction.

One part of a National Cancer Institute randomized clinical trial of over 150,000 people—the Prostate, Colorectal, Lung, and Ovarian Screening Trial—is looking at whether screening men with digital rectal examinations plus a PSA test can reduce deaths from prostate cancer. Results from this large trial, which should be available later this decade, could help clarify the benefits of prostate cancer screening.

The Task Force, the leading independent panel of private-sector experts in prevention and primary care, conducts rigorous, impartial assessments of all the scientific evidence for a broad range of preventive services. Its recommendations are considered the gold standard for clinical preventive services.

The Task Force grades the strength of the evidence from "A" (strongly recommends) to "D" (recommends against) or "I" (insufficient evidence). The Task Force found insufficient evidence that clinicians should routinely provide prostate cancer screening to those men not at high risk for the disease. In 1996, the Task Force recommended against routine prostate cancer screening for men.

Select to access the prostate cancer screening recommendation and materials for clinicians.

Previous Task Force recommendations, summaries of the evidence, easy-to-read fact sheets explaining the recommendations, and related materials are available from the AHRQ Publications Clearinghouse.

Clinical information is also available from the National Guideline Clearinghouse™.

Return to Contents
Proceed to Next Article

The information on this page is archived and provided for reference purposes only.


AHRQ Advancing Excellence in Health Care