This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://info.ahrq.gov. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.
Please go to www.ahrq.gov for current information.
The lead article in the April 2000 issue of Research Activities summarizes a study by Gifford, Morton, Fiske, and others, on lack of progress as a reason for cesarean. Within the article, the statement "... doctors may be more at ease with risks associated with c-sections than they are with continuing to observe a labor in the second stage that is not progressing as rapidly as expected" is misleading. As the authors point out in their paper, "Many cesareans are done during the latent phase of labor [up to 10 cm dilation] and in the second stage of labor [10 cm dilation through delivery] when it is not prolonged." Thus, use of the term "second stage" was unnecessarily restrictive. We apologize for any confusion this misstatement may have caused.
Return to Contents
Proceed to Next Article