This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://info.ahrq.gov. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.
Please go to www.ahrq.gov for current information.
Applying strategies that focus on laboratory specimen labeling errors can significantly reduce specimen identification errors
A typical hospital clinical laboratory receives thousands of specimens to analyze daily. A mislabeled clinical laboratory specimen, a common and avoidable problem, can lead to devastating consequences for patients. Applying strategies that focus on laboratory specimen labeling errors can significantly reduce specimen identification errors, according to a new study supported in part by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HS11512).
Researchers used a clinical laboratory database to analyze three blood specimen/patient identification errors: unlabeled specimens, mislabeled specimens, and specimen/requisition mismatch (specimen received with a requisition that did not match the request or patient identified on the tube or container). Error trends were followed over a 2-year period both before and after implementation of three patient safety projects.
These included: reorganization of phlebotomy services to 24-hour service and intensive care unit nursing in-service phlebotomy education; implementation of an online electronic adverse event reporting system; and installation of an automated specimen processing system. Of 16,632 total specimen errors, mislabeled specimens, requisition mismatches, and unlabeled specimens represented 1 percent, 6.3 percent, and 4.6 percent of errors, respectively.
The most serious errors, mislabeled specimens, declined significantly after implementation of the three patient safety projects compared to before their implementation. Trend analysis also revealed decreases in all three clinical specimen error types for 26 months.
More details are in "Patient safety in the clinical laboratory: A longitudinal analysis of specimen identification errors," by Elizabeth A. Wagar, M.D., Lorraine Tamashiro, B.S., Bushra Yasin, Ph.D., and others, in the November 2006 Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine 130, pp. 1662-1668.
Return to Contents
Proceed to Next Article