Skip Navigation U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Agency for Healthcare Research Quality
Archive print banner

Mind-Body Interventions

This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.

Please go to for current information.

Full Title: Mind-Body Interventions for Gastrointestinal Conditions

March 2001

View or download Summary/Report

Structured Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this evidence report was to conduct a search of the literature on the use of all mind-body therapies for the treatment of health conditions and, on the basis of that search, to choose either a condition or a mind-body modality for a comprehensive review. The health condition chosen, based on the results of an initial search, was gastrointestinal (GI) problems.

The specific questions addressed in this project were:
  1. What mind-body therapies have been used in the literature, for which body systems/conditions, and using what kind of research design?
  2. What is the efficacy of mind-body therapies for the treatment of GI problems?

Search Strategy: A research librarian performed an initial database search of MEDLINE®, HealthSTAR, EMBASE®, Allied and Complementary Medicine™, MANTIS™, PsycINFO®, Social Science Citation Index®, two files of Science Citation Index®, and CINAHL®. We used "mind/body relations (metaphysics)" and "mind body therapies" as the MeSH term and a set of synonyms for mind-body. A more focused search was conducted for gastrointestinal health problems and mind-body.

Selection Criteria: The literature search was confined to those mind-body therapies currently recognized as such by the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM). In the initial search, all studies focusing on mind-body therapies were included. Those studies that focused on GI problems were then identified. The mind-body therapies documented in the literature for treating GI problems included:

  • Behavioral therapy.
  • Biofeedback.
  • Cognitive therapy.
  • Guided imagery.
  • Hypnosis.
  • Placebo.
  • Relaxation therapy, and multimodal therapy.
  • Data collection and analysis.

All titles, abstracts, or articles were reviewed by two independent reviewers and entered into a database. The titles/or abstracts/or articles were analyzed and synthesized into a descriptive report. Particular attention was paid to the mind-body modality used, the target body systems/conditions, the outcomes measured, and the type of study design used. An in-depth analysis was conducted on those studies that focused on GI conditions. We identified 53 GI studies that included a concurrent comparison group. Because of the clinical heterogeneity of these trials, however, we did not conduct a meta-analysis. Instead, a qualitative synthesis was conducted.

Main Results: In the search of mind-body studies, the most common body systems/conditions for which mind-body therapy literature was found are:

  • Neuropsychiatric.
  • Head/ear, nose, and throat (head/ENT).
  • Gastrointestinal.
  • Circulatory.
  • Musculoskeletal.

Regarding therapies, the most common ones for which published studies were found were: biofeedback, hypnosis, relaxation, behavioral, and cognitive. For GI conditions, the most commonly studied mind-body therapy was biofeedback (n = 22), and the most commonly studied conditions were irritable bowel syndrome (n = 15), followed by fecal incontinence/encopresis (n = 11). Studies with a comparison group were reviewed for biofeedback (n = 17), hypnosis (n = 8), relaxation therapy (n = 8), behavioral therapy (n = 8), multimodal therapy (n = 4), cognitive therapy (n = 4), guided imagery (n = 2), and placebo (n = 1).

  • Eleven of the biofeedback studies had a no biofeedback comparison group, and two reported a significant benefit from biofeedback. These studies were of adults with fecal incontinence and nausea/vomiting following chemotherapy. In the remaining nine biofeedback trials, seven of which were on children, biofeedback was not reported to have any benefit.
  • There were seven studies of hypnosis that had a no hypnosis comparison group, six of which reported a significant benefit (for irritable bowel syndrome, two studies; nausea/vomiting, two studies; duodenal ulcer, one study; and ulcerative colitis, one study).
  • Six of the eight relaxation-therapy controlled trials reported a significant benefit for irritable bowel syndrome (two studies), nausea/vomiting (two studies), ulcer (one study), and GI distress (one study).
  • For the eight studies in behavioral therapy, six studies with a no behavioral therapy comparison group reported a significant benefit for encopresis (one study), nausea/vomiting (two studies), irritable bowel syndrome (two studies), and abdominal pain (one study).
  • In cognitive therapy, four studies, all with a no cognitive therapy comparison group, reported a significant benefit. These were for irritable bowel (three studies) and ulcer (one study). In guided imagery therapy, one out of two studies with a no imagery comparison group reported a significant benefit.
  • In placebo therapy there was only a single study.
  • Four studies using a multimodal intervention, which does not enable a conclusion about individual therapies, were also reviewed.

Conclusions: There are limited data to support the efficacy of relaxation therapy, behavioral therapy, cognitive therapy and guided imagery as therapy for certain gastrointestinal conditions. There is no evidence to support the efficacy of biofeedback for children with gastrointestinal conditions, while for adults the evidence is mixed. The studies of hypnosis are limited by methodologic problems and no conclusions can be drawn.

Download Report

Mind-Body Interventions for Gastrointestinal Conditions

Evidence-based Practice Center: Southern California
Topic Nominator: National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Current as of March 2001


The information on this page is archived and provided for reference purposes only.


AHRQ Advancing Excellence in Health Care