Skip Navigation Archive: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Archive: Agency for Healthcare Research Quality
Archival print banner

This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.

Please go to for current information.

Single Specialty Hospitals and Economic Efficiency: Evidence from the Supply Side

Slide Presentation from the AHRQ 2011 Annual Conference

Slide 1

Description below the image

Single Specialty Hospitals And Economic Efficiency: Evidence From The Supply Side

Kathleen Carey* James F. Burgess Jr.* and Gary J. Young**

AHRQ Annual Meeting—September 21, 2011

Research funded in part by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and by AHRQ.

*Boston University School of Public Health and Department of Veterans Affairs
** Northeastern University

Slide 2

Description below the image

Legislative History of Single Specialty Hospitals (SSHs): I

  • Ethics in Patient Referrals Act (Stark I & II): 1989, 1993.
  • "Whole Hospital Exception": a fertile environment for development of new SSHs.
  • Reasons for proliferation?
    • Distortions in the payment system.
    • Technological advances.
    • Dissatisfaction on the part of physicians with responses of hospital administrators.
  • Moratorium on new physician-owned cardiac, orthopedic, and surgical SSHs: 2003 to 2006.

Slide 3

Description below the image

Legislative History of Single Specialty Hospitals (SSHs): II

  • What were the issues?
    • Patient selection: cherry-picking.
    • Financial impact on community hospitals.
    • Conflict of interest: self-referral, induced demand.
  • Medicare inpatient reimbursement structure reform: FY2007.
  • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Section 6001:
    • Whole hospital exception dismantled.
    • Stricter limitations on grandfathered SSHs.

Slide 4

Description below the image

What Lies Ahead? I

  • Efforts to remove restrictions in Section 6001 underway:
    • Lobbying efforts to persuade legislators.
    • Legal challenges around the constitutionality to persuade the courts.
  • Restrictions only relate to SSHs with respect to reimbursement under federal insurance programs (viz., Medicare).
  • SSHs can continue to operate by relying on reimbursements from private plans and on out-of-pocket payments by patients.

Slide 5

Description below the image

What Lies Ahead? II

  • All SSHs are not the same.
  • Two types: Orthopedic/Surgical and Cardiac.
  • Key differentiating factors in addition to specialization:
    • Size: Cardiac average 60 beds—OrthSurg average 20.
    • Scope of Services: Most OrthSurg SSHs do not have Emergency Departments but most Cardiac SSHs do.
    • Payer mix: MedPAC found that ~ 2/3 of Cardiac SSH patients were reimbursed by Medicare and 1/3 by private payers; for OrthSurg SSHs just the reverse.

Slide 6

Description below the image

What Does the Literature Show?

  • Self-referral:
    • Mitchell, Medical Care (2008):
      • In referrals by orthopedic doc-owners compared to non-owners, OK SSHs.
  • Utilization:
    • Nallamothu, JAMA (2007):
      • In coronary revascularization procedures, Medicare population.
    • Mitchell, Medical Care Research & Review (2007):
      • In complex spinal fusion procedures, OK SSHs.
  • Selection:
    • GAO Report, 2003.
    • Cram et al., NEJM 2005.
    • Mitchell, Health Affairs 2005.
    • Guterman, Health Affairs 2006.
  • Cost:
    • Barro et al. Journal of Health Economics (2006):
      • Spending for cardiac care in markets w/ cardiac SSHs w/o worse outcomes.
    • Schneider et al., Inquiry 2007: ? in hospital level costs, national SSH study.
    • Carey et al. Health Services Research (2008):
      • Orthopedic/Surgical SSHs cost inefficiency.

Slide 7

Description below the image

Research Questions

  • The question of SSH cost efficiency is deep.
  • One economic issue is whether there is "enough scale at all of these separate institutions to allow them to operate efficiently" (Newhouse, 2004).
  • Also, more services allow for joint costs of services.

Do SSHs realize economies of scale?

Do SSHs realize economies of scope?

Slide 8

Description below the image


  • Too few observations on cardiac SSHs.
  • We focused on orthopedic and surgical SSHs.
  • These hospitals are primarily engaged in outpatient surgical services.
  • They also treat inpatients, although on a smaller scale.
  • Multiple output cost function with 2 outputs:
    • Inpatient Discharges.
    • Outpatient Visits.

Slide 9

Description below the image

Hospital Cost Function Approach

Operating Costs =
f (discharges, outpatient visits, average length of stay, wage index, bed size, case-mix index, outpatient case-mix index, teaching hospital indicator, ownership, SSH indicator, SSH*discharges, SSH*outpatient visits).

Slide 10

Description below the image

Data Sources

  • Medicare Cost Reports 1998-2008.
  • American Hospital Association Annual Survey Database.
  • ~ 90% of SSHs are located in 10 states (n=405):
    • Arizona.
    • California.
    • Idaho.
    • Indiana.
    • Kansas.
    • Louisiana.
    • Ohio.
    • Oklahoma.
    • South Dakota.
    • Texas.
  • Competitors in same market (n=5,273)
    (Dartmouth Hospital Referral Regions).

Slide 11

Description below the image

Production Cost Efficiency Construct I: EOS

  • Economies of Scale (EOS).
  • Does the average cost decline as output increases? Or, is cost ↑ < output ↑(in proportional terms).
  • EOS = [1/ (MC/AC)] = [1 / cost elasticity].
  • For multiple outputs, Ray Scale EOS assumes that all outputs increase proportionately.
  • Ray EOS = [1 / Σ cost elasticities].

Slide 12

Description below the image

Graphic Conceptualization of EOS

Image: Line graph with "Cost" and "Medical Services" on the x and y axes compares Range of EOS, Marginal Cost, and Average Cost.

Slide 13

Description below the image

  • Short-run cost function.
  • Cubic functional form.
  • GEE estimator.


(1 - BED elasticity) / (DIS elasticity + OPV elasticity) =

(1 - δ*BED) / [(α11DIS + 2*α21DIS2 + 3*α31DIS)3 +
β11OPV +2* β21OPV2 + 3*β31OPV)3

Slide 14

Description below the image

Results: EOS

 General HospitalsSpecialty Hospitals

Slide 15

Description below the image

Production Cost Efficiency Construct II: ESC

  • Economies of scope (ESC): present if the cost of jointly producing a set of outputs is lower than the costs of producing those outputs separately.
  • For the 2 output case:

    ESC = [C(DIS,0) + C(0,OPV) - C(DIS,OPV)] / C(DIS,OPV)

  • ESC are present if the expression is positive:
    • Will occur if the numerator is positive.
    • Indicates it is cheaper to produce outputs DIS and OPV jointly than in separate facilities.
  • The expression rarely applied in the case of hospitals.
  • Why not? Because it is unusual that hospitals would be producing at levels of zero output.

Slide 16

Description below the image

ESC: What if orthopedic and surgical SSHs closed their doors?

  • Alternative conception of economies of Scope (ESC).
  • ESC exist if it is possible to produce outputs jointly in the same hospital cheaper than it is to produce them separately.
  • How will we measure ESC?
    • ESC = [C(System A) + C(System B) - C(System C)] / C(System C).
    • Where System A is general hospital production, System B is SSH production, and System C is a simulation of general hospital technology cost of producing (general hospital + SSH) outputs.

Slide 17

Description below the image

Cost A refers to production of general hospital output using general hospital technology.

Cost B refers to production of specialty hospital output using specialty hospital technology.

Cost C refers to joint production of general hospital and specialty hospital output using general hospital technology.

Slide 18

Description below the image

[ESC = (Cost A + Cost B - Cost C) / Cost C]

Specialty HospitalsGeneral Hospitals
1st QuartileMedian3rd Quartile
1st Quartile(22.71+8.62-23.95)/23.95
= 0.30
= 0.16
= 0.05
= 0.38
= 0.18
= 0.05
3rd Quartile(22.71+21.09-27.62)/27.62
= 0.59
= 0.28
= 0.07

Costs measured in million $.
Quartile values taken across distributions of discharges and outpatient visits.

Slide 19

Description below the image

Results: ESC, continued

Implicit Cost Savings (million dollars):
(Cost A + Cost B—Cost C).

Specialty HospitalsGeneral Hospitals
1st QuartileMedian3rd Quartile
1st Quartile7.386.725.37
3rd Quartile16.1813.618.34

Slide 20

Description below the image


  • SSHs may lack sufficient scale to compete effectively with general hospitals on the basis of cost efficiency:
    • Yet this supply side analysis does not account for demand side price competition pressures.
  • Simulation analyses also suggest potential improvement in cost efficiency through exploitation of economies of scope by shifting SSH production to general hospitals.
  • But only one piece of evidence in understanding a very complex issue: SSHs might be able to control costs through leaner staffing, tighter inventory control and/or effective discharge planning, e.g.
Page last reviewed October 2014
Internet Citation: Single Specialty Hospitals and Economic Efficiency: Evidence from the Supply Side. October 2014. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD.


The information on this page is archived and provided for reference purposes only.


AHRQ Advancing Excellence in Health Care