Skip Navigation Archive: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Archive: Agency for Healthcare Research Quality
Archival print banner

This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.

Please go to for current information.

Testimony on Comparative Effectiveness Research

Jordan Green, National Alliance for Care

On April 3, 2009, public testimony on comparative effectiveness research was given at a meeting of the National Advisory Council for Healthcare Research and Quality. The testimony represents the views of the presenter and not necessarily those of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) or the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

Policy on Comparative Effectiveness Research

The National Alliance for Caregiving believes that for a comparative effectiveness program to be successful, it cannot be used as a "tool" to simply ration health care. It must improve patient outcomes, and include the front-line defenders in chronic care coordination and management--the family caregivers

Together with patients and healthcare providers, family caregivers are a critical part of an interdisciplinary care team helping to meet the needs of individuals with multiple chronic care conditions. There are 44.4 million family caregivers providing unpaid care to a loved one over the age of 18. Approximately 25 percent of these caregivers are caring for someone with Alzheimer's or other dementia. The economic value of caregivers' unpaid contributions is estimated at around $375 billion in 2008, according to AARP's Public Policy Institute. Lack of communication and coordination among the patient and family caregiver and the health care provider produces poor health outcomes such as: medical errors, duplicative or unnecessary tests, inappropriate emergency room visits, hospital re-admissions due to poor follow-up care, inadequate discharge planning, lack of appropriate care and support services upon returning home, adverse drug interactions and ultimately rising medical costs.

We urge the panel to embrace five principals to guide your work:

  • Conduct your research in an open and transparent process, one that is open to all stakeholders, including family caregivers;
  • Include patients and family caregivers in any review panels for comments about what procedures and decisions are being compared;
  • Communicate your findings in a way that is easily understandable to the general public;
  • Identify ways to partner with family caregivers in their role as primary care coordinators for patients with chronic care illnesses or disabilities; and
  • Ensure the appropriate inclusion of and support for family caregivers in developing long-range goals for health care reform.
Page last reviewed April 2009
Internet Citation: Testimony on Comparative Effectiveness Research: Jordan Green, National Alliance for Care. April 2009. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD.


The information on this page is archived and provided for reference purposes only.


AHRQ Advancing Excellence in Health Care