Skip Navigation Archive: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Archive: Agency for Healthcare Research Quality
www.ahrq.gov
AHRQ Home—Live Site | Archive Home | Site Map
Archival print banner

This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://info.ahrq.gov. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.

Please go to www.ahrq.gov for current information.

Previous Page Next Page
  • Table of Contents
    • Contents
    • Executive Summary
    • Background
    • Methods
    • Next Steps
    • References
    • Appendixes
    • Members of the AHRQ NAC Subcommittee on Children's Healthcare Quality Measures for Medicaid and CHIP Programs
    • Appendix TablesOnline Measure Nominations Template
    • Instructions for Delphi Round 2 for AHRQ SNAC Members
    • One-page Summary Template
  • Download
    • PDF file PDF version - 480.54 KB

References

SNAC-recommended Initial Core Set, September 18, 2009

  1.  Brook RH. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. In: McCormick KA, Moore SR, Siegel RA, editors. Clinical practice guidelines development:methodology perspectives. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1994.
  2.  Hemingway H, Crook A, Feder G et al. Underuse of coronary revascularization procedures in patients considered appropriate candidates for revascularization. N Engl J Med 2001;344(9):645-654.
  3.  Kravitz RL, Park RE, Kahan JP. Measuring the clinical consistency of panelists' appropriateness ratings: the case of coronary artery bypass surgery. Health Policy 1997;42(2):135-143.
  4.  Shekelle PG, Chassin MR, Park RE. Assessing the predictive ability of the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method criteria for performing carotid endarterectomy. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1998;14(4):707-727.
  5.  McGlynn EA, Kosecoff J, Brook RH. Format and conduct of consensus development conferences: a multi-nation comparison. In: Goodman C, Baratz S, editors. Improving consensus development for health technology assessment. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 1990.
Page last reviewed January 2010
Internet Citation: References: SNAC-recommended Initial Core Set, September 18, 2009. January 2010. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. https://archive.ahrq.gov/policymakers/chipra/coreset/coresetref.html

 

The information on this page is archived and provided for reference purposes only.

 
AHRQ Advancing Excellence in Health Care

AHRQ Home | Questions? | Contact AHRQ | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Freedom of Information Act | Disclaimers | Plain Writing Act
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | The White House | USA.gov: The U.S. Government's Official Web Portal

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 Telephone: (301) 427-1364