Skip Navigation Archive: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Archive: Agency for Healthcare Research Quality www.ahrq.gov
Archival print banner

This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://info.ahrq.gov. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.

Please go to www.ahrq.gov for current information.

Private Performance Feedback Reporting for Physicians

References

  1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Public Reports on Provider Performance for Consumers. Available at: www.ahrq.gov/path/publicreporting.htm. Accessed October 16, 2012.
  2. Teleki SS, Shaw R, Damberg CL, et al. Providing performance feedback to individual physicians: current practice and emerging lessons. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; April 2006.
  3. Gliklich RE, Dreyer NA, eds. Registries for evaluating patient outcomes: a user's guide. 2nd ed. (Prepared by Outcome DEcIDE Center [Outcomes Sciences, Inc., d/b/a Outcome] under Contract No. HHSA290200500351 T03.) AHRQ Publication No. 10-EHC049. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; September 2010.
  4. Greene RA, Beckman H, Chamberlain J, et al. Increasing adherence to a community-based guideline for acute sinusitis through education, physician profiling, and financial incentives. Am J Manag Care 2004 Oct;10(10):670-8.
  5. Kiefe CI, Allison JJ, Williams OD, et al. Improving quality improvement using achievable benchmarks for physician feedback. JAMA 2001;285(22):2871-9.
  6. McCormack LA, Burrus BB, Garfinkel SA, et al. Providing information to help Medicare beneficiaries choose a health plan. J Aging Soc Policy 2001;12(2):49-72.
  7. Peters E, Dieckmann NF, Mertz CK, et al. Bringing meaning to numbers: the impact of evaluative categories on decisions. J Exp Psychol Appl 2009;15(3):213-27.
  8. Uhrig JD, Harris-Kojetin JL, Bann C, et al. Do content and format affect older consumers' use of comparative information in a Medicare health plan choice? Results from a controlled experiment. Med Care Res Rev 2006;63(6):701-18.
  9. Fasolo B, Reutskaja E, Dixon A, et al. Helping patients choose: how to improve the design of comparative scorecards of hospital quality. Patient Educ Couns 2010;78(3):344-9.
  10. Hoy EW, Kenney E, Talavera AC. Engaging consumers in designing a guide to Medi-Cal care quality. California Healthcare Foundation; 2004. Available at: www.chcf.org/~/media/MEDIA%20LIBRARY%20Files/PDF/E/PDF%20EngagingConsumersInAGuideToMediCalManagedCare.pdf. Accessed December 4, 2011.
  11. Gerteis M, Gerteis JS, Newman D, et al. Testing consumers' comprehension of quality measures using alternative reporting formats. Health Care Financ Rev 2007 Spring;28(3):31-45.
  12. Lipkus IM, Peters E. Understanding the role of numeracy in health: proposed theoretical framework and practical insights. Health Educ Behav 2009;36(6):1065-81.
  13. Gaissmaier W, Wegwarth O, Skopec D, et al. Numbers can be worth a thousand pictures: individual differences in understanding graphical and numerical representations of health-related information. Health Psychol 2012;31(3):288-96.
  14. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Summary of the HIPAA Privacy Rule. Available at: www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/hipaa/understanding/summary/index.html. Accessed October 16, 2012.
  15. Guidelines for reporting physician data. Chicago: American Medical Association; 2012. Available at: www.ama-assn.org/resources/doc/psa/physician-reporting-guidelines.pdf. Accessed October 16, 2012.
  16. Conway AC, Keller RB, Wennberg DE. Partnering with physicians to achieve quality improvement. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 1995;21:619-26.
  17. Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristofferson DT, et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006 Apr 19;(2):CD000259.
  18. Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012 June 13;6:CD000259.
  19. Kanouse DE, Jacoby I. When does information change practitioners' behavior? Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1988;4:27-33.
  20. Bloom BS. Effects of continuing medical education on improving physician clinical care and patient health: a review of systematic reviews. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2005;21:380-5.
  21. Quigley DD, Wiseman SH, Farley DO. Improving performance for health plan customer service: a case study of a successful CAHPS quality improvement intervention. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; August 2007.

Return to Contents
Proceed to Next Section

Page last reviewed November 2012
Page originally created November 2012
Internet Citation: References. Content last reviewed November 2012. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. https://archive.ahrq.gov/professionals/clinicians-providers/resources/privfeedbackgdrpt/privfeedbackgdrptref.html

 

The information on this page is archived and provided for reference purposes only.

 

AHRQ Advancing Excellence in Health Care