Skip Navigation Archive: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Archive: Agency for Healthcare Research Quality www.ahrq.gov
Archival print banner

This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://info.ahrq.gov. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.

Please go to www.ahrq.gov for current information.

Priority Areas for National Action

Transforming Health Care Quality

Figure 2. Recommended Process Model

Figure 2. Recommended Process Model. Refer to Text Description below

Text Description:

This flow chart outlines the process for identifying priority areas for quality improvement. It begins with determining a framework, identifying candidates for priority areas, and establishing criteria based on impact, improvability, and inclusiveness. It then suggests categorizing candidate areas within each framework, applying impact and inclusiveness criteria, and developing a preliminary set of potential candidates. Improvability and inclusiveness criteria would then be applied, and priority areas would be reassessed and selected or not based on whether they met impact, inclusiveness, and improvability criteria.

Then, strategies for improvement would be developed, implemented, and measured. The list of priorities would be updated as necessary. Measures would be developed and implemented for priority areas, including important but currently unmeasured areas and areas for which impact and transformation could be measured.

AHRQ, in collaboration with other public and private entities, would continue the process by annually reviewing and reporting on measured results and disseminating information on improvement efforts. Every 3 years, AHRQ would solicit public input; review and revise the framework, criteria, and candidate list; assess current priorities and new candidates against criteria; decide on an updated priority list; establish a process to determine plans for implementation; and revise and continue measures. Public input from multiple sources would be solicited at all stages.

Return to Document

 

Page last reviewed December 2012
Internet Citation: iomfig2.htm. December 2012. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. https://archive.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patient-safety-resources/resources/iompriorities/iomfig2.html

 

The information on this page is archived and provided for reference purposes only.

 

AHRQ Advancing Excellence in Health Care